These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26094834)

  • 1. Repeatability of a novel corneal indentation device for corneal biomechanical measurement.
    Lam AK; Hon Y; Leung LK; Lam DC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Jul; 35(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 26094834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of corneal tangent elastic modulus measurement using corneal indentation device.
    Ko MW; Leung LK; Lam DC
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1115-21. PubMed ID: 24984588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.
    Kynigopoulos M; Schlote T; Kotecha A; Tzamalis A; Pajic B; Haefliger I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High myopes have lower normalised corneal tangent moduli (less 'stiff' corneas) than low myopes.
    Hon Y; Chen GZ; Lu SH; Lam DC; Lam AK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 27873338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of corneal tangent modulus in vivo.
    Ko MW; Leung LK; Lam DC; Leung CK
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):e263-9. PubMed ID: 23336962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of corneal tangent modulus using ultrasound indentation.
    Wang LK; Huang YP; Tian L; Kee CS; Zheng YP
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Sep; 71():20-28. PubMed ID: 27262352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal biomechanical parameters derived from Corvis ST.
    Serbecic N; Beutelspacher S; Markovic L; Roy AS; Shetty R
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1287-1294. PubMed ID: 31744320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diurnal Variation of Corneal Tangent Modulus in Normal Chinese.
    Hon Y; Wan K; Chen GZ; Lu SH; Lam DC; Lam AK
    Cornea; 2016 Dec; 35(12):1600-1604. PubMed ID: 27538192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jul; 35(7):587-96. PubMed ID: 20597645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.
    Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and repeatability of a new tono-pachymeter for measuring central corneal thickness.
    Garcia-Resua C; Blanco A; Miñones M; Yebra-Pimentel E; Jesus Giraldez M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 May; 38(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 22415152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.
    Hua Y; Xu Z; Qiu W; Wu Q
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147086. PubMed ID: 26752059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrasession Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility Measurements Using VX120 Multidiagnostic Unit.
    Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Martin R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S266-S272. PubMed ID: 29461300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeatability of Ocular Response Analyzer waveform parameters in normal eyes and eyes after refractive surgery.
    Landoulsi H; Saad A; Haddad NN; Guilbert E; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 29(10):709-14. PubMed ID: 24094311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry.
    Hon Y; Lam AK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 90(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 23238261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Mucke S; Osuagwu UL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23009324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.