These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26095449)

  • 1. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summary measures of agreement and association between many raters' ordinal classifications.
    Mitani AA; Freer PE; Nelson KP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):677-685.e4. PubMed ID: 29029991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A measure of association for ordered categorical data in population-based studies.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):812-831. PubMed ID: 27184590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the influence of rater and subject characteristics on measures of agreement for ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3181-3199. PubMed ID: 28612356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A paired kappa to compare binary ratings across two medical tests.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3272-3287. PubMed ID: 31099902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Zhou TJ; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 32529683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods of assessing categorical agreement between correlated screening tests in clinical studies.
    Zhou TJ; Raza S; Nelson KP
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(10):1861-1881. PubMed ID: 34305250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring rater bias in diagnostic tests with ordinal ratings.
    Kim C; Lin X; Nelson KP
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(17):4014-4033. PubMed ID: 33969509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulating and estimating agreement in the presence of multiple raters and covariates.
    McKenzie KA; Mahnken JD
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(11):1687-1698. PubMed ID: 36872574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond kappa: an informational index for diagnostic agreement in dichotomous and multivalue ordered-categorical ratings.
    Casagrande A; Fabris F; Girometti R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Dec; 58(12):3089-3099. PubMed ID: 33145661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter- and intra-observer variability of qualitative visual breast-composition assessment in mammography among Japanese physicians: a first multi-institutional observer performance study in Japan.
    Koyama Y; Nakashima K; Orihara S; Tsunoda H; Kimura F; Uenaka N; Ban K; Michishita Y; Kanemaki Y; Kurihara A; Tawaraya K; Taguri M; Ishikawa T; Uematsu T
    Breast Cancer; 2024 Jul; 31(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 38619787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying rater variation for ordinal data using a rating scale model.
    Zhang S; Petersen JH
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(14):2223-2237. PubMed ID: 29663479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the reliability of diagnostic tests in population-based agreement studies.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 20128018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness of
    Vanacore A; Pellegrino MS
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1986-2004. PubMed ID: 35124830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.
    Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; Wedding D; Gwet KL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Apr; 13():61. PubMed ID: 23627889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical description of interrater variability in ordinal ratings.
    Nelson JC; Pepe MS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):475-96. PubMed ID: 11191261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists.
    Timmers JM; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Verbeek AL; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2184-8. PubMed ID: 21899969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.