BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26095614)

  • 1. Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation.
    Morris TP; White IR; Carpenter JR; Stanworth SJ; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(25):3298-317. PubMed ID: 26095614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Building multivariable regression models with continuous covariates in clinical epidemiology--with an emphasis on fractional polynomials.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 16342923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Holder RL; Royston P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jul; 9():57. PubMed ID: 19638200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of using multiple imputation for missing out-of-hospital data in a state trauma registry.
    Newgard CD
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Mar; 13(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 16495420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between splines and fractional polynomials for multivariable model building with continuous covariates: a simulation study with continuous response.
    Binder H; Sauerbrei W; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(13):2262-77. PubMed ID: 23034770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cox regression analysis with missing covariates via nonparametric multiple imputation.
    Hsu CH; Yu M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1676-1688. PubMed ID: 29717943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adding local components to global functions for continuous covariates in multivariable regression modeling.
    Binder H; Sauerbrei W
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):808-17. PubMed ID: 20213721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation and variable selection in linear regression models with missing covariates.
    Yang X; Belin TR; Boscardin WJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):498-506. PubMed ID: 16011697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods for significance testing of categorical covariates in logistic regression models after multiple imputation: power and applicability analysis.
    Eekhout I; van de Wiel MA; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 28830466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A bias-corrected estimator in multiple imputation for missing data.
    Tomita H; Fujisawa H; Henmi M
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3373-3386. PubMed ID: 29845646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of important variables and determination of functional form for continuous predictors in multivariable model building.
    Sauerbrei W; Royston P; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5512-28. PubMed ID: 18058845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of influential points and sample size on the selection and replicability of multivariable fractional polynomial models.
    Sauerbrei W; Kipruto E; Balmford J
    Diagn Progn Res; 2023 Apr; 7(1):7. PubMed ID: 37069621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining multiple imputation and meta-analysis with individual participant data.
    Burgess S; White IR; Resche-Rigon M; Wood AM
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4499-514. PubMed ID: 23703895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A real data-driven simulation strategy to select an imputation method for mixed-type trait data.
    May JA; Feng Z; Adamowicz SJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e1010154. PubMed ID: 36947561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The multiple imputation method: a case study involving secondary data analysis.
    Walani SR; Cleland CM
    Nurse Res; 2015 May; 22(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 25976532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple pooling method for variable selection in multiply imputed datasets outperformed complex methods.
    Panken AM; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):214. PubMed ID: 35927610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration.
    Eisemann N; Waldmann A; Katalinic A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Sep; 11():129. PubMed ID: 21929796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advanced methods for missing values imputation based on similarity learning.
    Fouad KM; Ismail MM; Azar AT; Arafa MM
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e619. PubMed ID: 34395861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E; White IR; Sperrin M; Buchan I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.