100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26095758)
1. Gamma index comparison of three VMAT QA systems and evaluation of their sensitivity to delivery errors.
Vieillevigne L; Molinier J; Brun T; Ferrand R
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26095758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance (QA) systems: sensitivity analysis to machine errors.
Liang B; Liu B; Zhou F; Yin FF; Wu Q
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):146. PubMed ID: 27821135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Li G; Bai S; Chen N; Henderson L; Wu K; Xiao J; Zhang Y; Jiang Q; Jiang X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):13-24. PubMed ID: 24036856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: evaluation and comparison of different dosimetric systems.
Masi L; Casamassima F; Doro R; Francescon P
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):612-21. PubMed ID: 21452698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance.
Saito M; Sano N; Shibata Y; Kuriyama K; Komiyama T; Marino K; Aoki S; Ashizawa K; Yoshizawa K; Onishi H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):87-93. PubMed ID: 29500857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of a helical diode array dosimeter to Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy delivery errors.
Arumugam S; Xing A; Young T; Holloway L
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 26429384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Wang Q; Dai J; Zhang K
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101712. PubMed ID: 24089902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel technique for VMAT QA with EPID in cine mode on a Varian TrueBeam linac.
Liu B; Adamson J; Rodrigues A; Zhou F; Yin FF; Wu Q
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6683-700. PubMed ID: 24018655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Swiss cheese error detection method for real-time EPID-based quality assurance and error prevention.
Passarge M; Fix MK; Manser P; Stampanoni MF; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1212-1223. PubMed ID: 28134989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.
Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Fuangord T; Stanton CJ; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):348-365. PubMed ID: 27685132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An error detection method for real-time EPID-based treatment delivery quality assurance.
Alves VGL; Ahmed M; Aliotta E; Choi W; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):569-578. PubMed ID: 33314247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-treatment verification of lung SBRT VMAT plans with delivery errors: Toward a better understanding of the gamma index analysis.
Alharthi T; Pogson EM; Arumugam S; Holloway L; Thwaites D
Phys Med; 2018 May; 49():119-128. PubMed ID: 29685425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK to detect errors in 6MV FFF VMAT delivery of brain SABR using ROC analysis.
Tattenberg S; Hyde D; Milette MP; Parodi K; Araujo C; Carlone M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 22(6):35-44. PubMed ID: 34021691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three commercial dosimetric systems in detecting clinically significant VMAT delivery errors.
Arumugam S; Xing A; Young T; Thwaites D; Holloway L
Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 27717741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of VMAT dosimetric verifications between fixed and rotating gantry positions.
Zhu J; Chen L; Jin G; Luo G; Cao W; Liu X
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 58(5):1315-22. PubMed ID: 23388132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of combined use of ArcCheck
Moliner G; Sorro L; Verstraet R; Daviau PA; Casas M; Piron B; Dubois K; Debrigode C; Barrau C; Bons F; Greffier J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):133-139. PubMed ID: 30338922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An oscillating sweeping gap test for VMAT quality assurance.
Bhagwat MS; Han Z; Ng SK; Zygmanski P
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5029-44. PubMed ID: 20702923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
