These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26096144)

  • 1. Confirming, Validating, and Norming the Factor Structure of Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change Initial and Intersession.
    Pinsof WM; Zinbarg RE; Shimokawa K; Latta TA; Goldsmith JZ; Knobloch-Fedders LM; Chambers AL; Lebow JL
    Fam Process; 2015 Sep; 54(3):464-84. PubMed ID: 26096144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laying the foundation for progress research in family, couple, and individual therapy: the development and psychometric features of the initial systemic therapy inventory of change.
    Pinsof WM; Zinbarg RE; Lebow JL; Knobloch-Fedders LM; Durbin E; Chambers A; Latta T; Karam E; Goldsmith J; Friedman G
    Psychother Res; 2009 Mar; 19(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 19235092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity to change of the Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change (STIC) intersession scales.
    He Y; Zinbarg RE; Goldsmith JZ; Williams AL; Pinsof WM
    Psychother Res; 2024 Apr; 34(4):461-474. PubMed ID: 37695995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of the Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change Initial scales.
    Zinbarg RE; Pinsof W; Quirk K; Kendall A; Goldsmith J; Hardy N; He Y; Sabey A; Latta T
    Psychother Res; 2018 Sep; 28(5):734-749. PubMed ID: 28569097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change (STIC) Initial Scales: Are they sensitive to change?
    He Y; Hardy NR; Zinbarg RE; Goldsmith JZ; Kramer A; Williams AL; Pinsof WM
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Sep; 31(9):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 31219281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric Properties and Responsiveness to Change of 15- and 28-Item Versions of the SCORE: A Family Assessment Questionnaire.
    Hamilton E; Carr A; Cahill P; Cassells C; Hartnett D
    Fam Process; 2015 Sep; 54(3):454-63. PubMed ID: 25585671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feedback in Couple and Family Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Tilden T; Wampold BE; Ulvenes P; Zahl-Olsen R; Hoffart A; Barstad B; Olsen IA; Gude T; Pinsof WM; Zinbarg RE; Nilssen HH; Håland ÅT
    Fam Process; 2020 Mar; 59(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 31497883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrative problem-centered metaframeworks therapy II: planning, conversing, and reading feedback.
    Pinsof W; Breunlin DC; Russell WP; Lebow J
    Fam Process; 2011 Sep; 50(3):314-36. PubMed ID: 21884073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 25 years of systemic therapies research: progress and promise.
    Heatherington L; Friedlander ML; Diamond GM; Escudero V; Pinsof WM
    Psychother Res; 2015; 25(3):348-64. PubMed ID: 25506726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the STIC measurement and feedback system improve multisystemic outcomes in individual, couple and family therapy? A randomized clinical trial.
    Pinsof W; Zinbarg R; He Y; Goldsmith J; Latta T; Lebow J
    Psychother Res; 2024 Nov; 34(8):1078-1091. PubMed ID: 38442028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data on the individual problems and strengths scale from the systemic therapy inventory of change. Clinical samples from Norway.
    Zahl-Olsen R; Haaland ÅT; Tilden T
    Data Brief; 2021 Dec; 39():107577. PubMed ID: 34825038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of client feedback on couple psychotherapy outcomes.
    Reese RJ; Toland MD; Slone NC; Norsworthy LA
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2010 Dec; 47(4):616-30. PubMed ID: 21198247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factorial and construct validity of the revised short form integrative psychotherapy alliance scales for family, couple, and individual therapy.
    Pinsof WM; Zinbarg R; Knobloch-Fedders LM
    Fam Process; 2008 Sep; 47(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 18831308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward making progress feedback an effective common factor in couple therapy.
    Halford WK; Hayes S; Christensen A; Lambert M; Baucom DH; Atkins DC
    Behav Ther; 2012 Mar; 43(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 22304878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Review of Self-Report Family Assessment Measures.
    Hamilton E; Carr A
    Fam Process; 2016 Mar; 55(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 26582601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of an anecdotal client feedback note in family therapy.
    Haber R; Carlson RG; Braga C
    Fam Process; 2014 Jun; 53(2):307-17. PubMed ID: 24702034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: a randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting.
    Anker MG; Duncan BL; Sparks JA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2009 Aug; 77(4):693-704. PubMed ID: 19634962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of systemic family therapy on the organization and operation of a pediatric psychotherapy unit].
    Mangold B
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1990 Mar; 39(3):94-7. PubMed ID: 2336428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Client Motivation for Therapy Scale: a measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy.
    Pelletier LG; Tuson KM; Haddad NK
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Apr; 68(2):414-35. PubMed ID: 9107015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrative problem-centered metaframeworks therapy I: core concepts and hypothesizing.
    Breunlin DC; Pinsof W; Russell WP; Lebow J
    Fam Process; 2011 Sep; 50(3):293-313. PubMed ID: 21884072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.