These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26096674)

  • 1. Effects of ignoring clustered data structure in confirmatory factor analysis of ordered polytomous items: a simulation study based on PANSS.
    Stochl J; Jones PB; Perez J; Khandaker GM; Böhnke JR; Croudace TJ
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2016 Sep; 25(3):205-19. PubMed ID: 26096674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multilevel ordinal factor analysis of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS).
    Stochl J; Jones PB; Plaistow J; Reininghaus U; Priebe S; Perez J; Croudace TJ
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2014 Mar; 23(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 24449161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating FIML and multiple imputation in joint ordinal-continuous measurements models with missing data.
    Lim AJ; Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1063-1077. PubMed ID: 34545537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Model Parameterization and Estimation Methods on Tests of Measurement Invariance With Ordered Polytomous Data.
    Koziol NA; Bovaird JA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Apr; 78(2):272-296. PubMed ID: 29795956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation.
    Clark DA; Bowles RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 29683723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models With Small Sample Sizes.
    Lüdtke O; Ulitzsch E; Robitzsch A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615162. PubMed ID: 33995176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polytomous multilevel testlet models for testlet-based assessments with complex sampling designs.
    Jiao H; Zhang Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Feb; 68(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 24571376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting the 5 dimensions of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.
    Levine SZ; Rabinowitz J
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Oct; 27(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 17873671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of sample size and distributional assumptions on competing models of the factor structure of the PANSS and BPRS.
    Tueller SJ; Johnson KL; Grimm KJ; Desmarais SL; Sellers BG; Van Dorn RA
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2017 Dec; 26(4):. PubMed ID: 27910162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural differences within negative and depressive syndrome dimensions in schizophrenia, organic brain disease, and major depression: A confirmatory factor analysis of the positive and negative syndrome scale.
    Eisenberg DP; Aniskin DB; White L; Stein JA; Harvey PD; Galynker II
    Psychopathology; 2009; 42(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 19451757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
    Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item response analysis of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.
    Santor DA; Ascher-Svanum H; Lindenmayer JP; Obenchain RL
    BMC Psychiatry; 2007 Nov; 7():66. PubMed ID: 18005449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does strict invariance matter? Valid group mean comparisons with ordered-categorical items.
    Tse WW; Lai MHC; Zhang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3117-3139. PubMed ID: 38030923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overfactoring in rating scale data: A comparison between factor analysis and item response theory.
    Revuelta J; Ximénez C; Minaya N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():982137. PubMed ID: 36533017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing interval estimates for small sample ordinal CFA models.
    Natesan P
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1599. PubMed ID: 26579002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): results from a German representative population sample.
    Kliem S; Lohmann A; Mößle T; Brähler E
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Apr; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 29699522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting Large Factor Analysis Models With Ordinal Data.
    DiStefano C; McDaniel HL; Zhang L; Shi D; Jiang Z
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):417-436. PubMed ID: 31105317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].
    Corbière M; Lesage A; Lauzon S; Ricard N; Reinharz D
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 14567162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.