156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26097153)
1. The influence of mesh topology in the abdominal wall repair process.
De Maria C; Burchielli S; Salvadori C; Santoro V; Montemurro F; Orsi G; Vozzi G
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2016 Aug; 104(6):1220-8. PubMed ID: 26097153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sirolimus-coated, poly(L-lactic acid)-modified polypropylene mesh with minimal intra-peritoneal adhesion formation in a rat model.
Lu S; Hu W; Zhang Z; Ji Z; Zhang T
Hernia; 2018 Dec; 22(6):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 29777326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model.
Junge K; Binnebösel M; Rosch R; Jansen M; Kämmer D; Otto J; Schumpelick V; Klinge U
Surg Endosc; 2009 Feb; 23(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 18437474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions.
Biondo-Simões ML; Carvalho LB; Conceição LT; Santos KB; Schiel WA; Arantes M; Silveira TD; Magri JC; Gomes FF
Acta Cir Bras; 2017 Feb; 32(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 28300876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevention of intestinal adhesion and regeneration of abdominal wall tissue with meshes containing an electrostatically spun acellular dermal matrix (ADM)/silk fibroin (SF) fiber composite polypropylene mesh.
Yang D; Song Z; Lin Y; Dong W; Fu S; Yang J; Zhang P; Gu Y
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Dec; 112():104087. PubMed ID: 32980670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Injectable Double Crosslinked Hydrogel-Polypropylene Composite Mesh for Repairing Full-Thickness Abdominal Wall Defects.
Zhao Y; Li X; Sun N; Mao Y; Ma T; Liu X; Cheng T; Shao X; Zhang H; Huang X; Li J; Huang N; Wang H
Adv Healthc Mater; 2024 Jun; 13(15):e2304489. PubMed ID: 38433421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.
Scheidbach H; Tamme C; Tannapfel A; Lippert H; Köckerling F
Surg Endosc; 2004 Feb; 18(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 14691711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part I-materials and structural conformation.
Todros S; Pavan PG; Natali AN
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 Apr; 105(3):689-699. PubMed ID: 26671827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Development of better tolerated prosthetic materials: applications in gynecological surgery].
Debodinance P; Delporte P; Engrand JB; Boulogne M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 12407323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part II-Biomechanical aspects.
Todros S; Pavan PG; Pachera P; Natali AN
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 May; 105(4):892-903. PubMed ID: 26687728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Butler CE; Prieto VG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 15277815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of peritoneal adhesions formation and tissue response to polypropylene - poli (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-(polyHEMA) implant on rats' abdominal wall.
Paulo NM; Malmonge SM; Menezes LB; Lima FG; Faria Ade M; Andrasckho MM; Moreira NM; Atayde IB; Silva MS
Acta Cir Bras; 2010 Aug; 25(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 20676491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preparation of poly(L-lactic acid)-modified polypropylene mesh and its antiadhesion in experimental abdominal wall defect repair.
Zhang Z; Zhang T; Li J; Ji Z; Zhou H; Zhou X; Gu N
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2014 Jan; 102(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 23661568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of chitosan membrane associated with polypropylene mesh to prevent peritoneal adhesion in rats.
Paulo NM; de Brito e Silva MS; Moraes AM; Rodrigues AP; de Menezes LB; Miguel MP; de Lima FG; de Morais Faria A; Lima LM
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Oct; 91(1):221-7. PubMed ID: 19399842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polypropylene mesh coated with hyaluronic acid/polyvinyl alcohol composite hydrogel for preventing bowel adhesion.
Wei D; Huang Y; Liang M; Yang L; Jiao G; Tao Y; Xu L; Zhang T; Ji Z
Int J Biol Macromol; 2024 Jun; 270(Pt 1):132061. PubMed ID: 38705326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mussel-inspired copolymer-coated polypropylene mesh with anti-adhesion efficiency for abdominal wall defect repair.
Hu W; Lu S; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wen Y; Zhang T; Ji Z
Biomater Sci; 2019 Mar; 7(4):1323-1334. PubMed ID: 30640329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface modification of polypropylene surgical meshes for improving adhesion with poloxamine hydrogel adhesive.
Lu X; Khanna A; Luzinov I; Nagatomi J; Harman M
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 May; 107(4):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 30267644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.
D'Amore L; Ceci F; Mattia S; Fabbi M; Negro P; Gossetti F
Hernia; 2017 Feb; 21(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 27757549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of three composite patches for repair of abdominal wall defect in rats under contaminated environment].
Yao J; Tian W; Li J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 25(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 21735781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
