BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26098200)

  • 1. Sample size considerations for historical control studies with survival outcomes.
    Zhu H; Zhang S; Ahn C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 26098200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculating sample size in trials using historical controls.
    Zhang S; Cao J; Ahn C
    Clin Trials; 2010 Aug; 7(4):343-53. PubMed ID: 20573638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size calculation for studies comparing binary outcomes using historical controls.
    Zhang S; Cao J; Ahn C
    Biom J; 2013 Mar; 55(2):190-202. PubMed ID: 23335222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uniform power method for sample size calculation in historical control studies with binary response.
    Lee JJ; Tseng C
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Aug; 22(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 11514040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size calculation based on efficient unconditional tests for clinical trials with historical controls.
    Shan G; Moonie S; Shen J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 25551261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample Size Calculation: Inaccurate A Priori Assumptions for Nuisance Parameters Can Greatly Affect the Power of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Tavernier E; Giraudeau B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132578. PubMed ID: 26173007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design of randomized controlled confirmatory trials using historical control data to augment sample size for concurrent controls.
    Yuan J; Liu J; Zhu R; Lu Y; Palm U
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):558-573. PubMed ID: 30612514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size determination for comparing more than two survival distributions.
    Ahnn S; Anderson SJ
    Stat Med; 1995 Oct; 14(20):2273-82. PubMed ID: 8552903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Chen YH; Li C; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2015 Dec; 12(6):584-95. PubMed ID: 26195615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of the effect size for sample size determination for a continuous response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.
    Ciarleglio MM; Arendt CD; Peduzzi PN
    Clin Trials; 2016 Jun; 13(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 26928986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and analysis of multiarm clinical trials with survival endpoints.
    Liu PY; Dahlberg S
    Control Clin Trials; 1995 Apr; 16(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 7789135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Designing historical control studies with survival endpoints using exact statistical inference.
    Han G
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Jan; 20(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 32743949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference and sample size calculation for clinical trials with incomplete observations of paired binary outcomes.
    Zhang S; Cao J; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):581-591. PubMed ID: 27862151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A rank-based sample size method for multiple outcomes in clinical trials.
    Huang P; Woolson RF; O'Brien PC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(16):3084-104. PubMed ID: 18189338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculation for the weighted rank statistics with paired survival data.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3350-65. PubMed ID: 18205148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size determination for longitudinal designs with binary response.
    Kapur K; Bhaumik R; Tang XC; Hur K; Reda DJ; Bhaumik DK
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3781-800. PubMed ID: 24820424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Tang H; Foster NR; Grothey A; Ansell SM; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1936-41. PubMed ID: 20212253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.