163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26099058)
1. Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.
Alhassan M; Hovis JK; Chou RB
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 26099058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
Goss DA; Patel J
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
Brownlee GA; Goss DA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments.
Hashemi H; Mirzaeian M; Narooie F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):629-635. PubMed ID: 34081653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.
Frantz KA; Elston P; Michalik E; Templeman CD; Zoltoski RK
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21423065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
Schroth V; Jaschinski W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve with the modified near Mallett unit and the wesson fixation disparity card in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Ehsani M; Kundart J
Strabismus; 2012 Dec; 20(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 23211142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Associated phoria and the measuring and correcting methodology after H.-J. Haase (MKH).
Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
Strabismus; 2001 Sep; 9(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 11704880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test-retest reliability of the Saladin card.
Corbett A; Maples WC
Optometry; 2004 Oct; 75(10):629-39. PubMed ID: 15508864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Dittemore D; Crum J; Kirschen D
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 8515972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
Karania R; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Wesson and modified Sheedy fixation disparity tests. Do fixation disparity measures relate to normal binocular status?
van Haeringen R; McClurg P; Cameron KD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3627800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a Hirschberg Test-Based Application for Measuring Ocular Alignment and Detecting Strabismus.
Garcia SSS; Santiago APD; Directo PMC
Curr Eye Res; 2021 Nov; 46(11):1768-1776. PubMed ID: 33856941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Interexaminer repeatability of a new, modified prentice card compared with established phoria tests.
Wong EP; Fricke TR; Dinardo C
Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 12086303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison, within-session repeatability and normative data of three phoria tests.
Facchin A; Maffioletti S
J Optom; 2021; 14(3):263-274. PubMed ID: 32763127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accommodative response under monocular and binocular conditions as a function of phoria in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Momeni-Moghaddam H; Goss DA; Sobhani M
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23808381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem?
Gall R; Wick B
Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
