BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26099071)

  • 1. The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.
    Deveau M; Chen CP; Johanson G; Krewski D; Maier A; Niven KJ; Ripple S; Schulte PA; Silk J; Urbanus JH; Zalk DM; Niemeier RW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. PubMed ID: 26099071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of a framework for the selection of an appropriate occupational exposure limit for manganese.
    Deveau M; Maier A; Krewski D
    Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jan; 58():249-256. PubMed ID: 27663849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
    Schenk L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Jeong JY; Choi S; Kho YL; Kim PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 20709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
    Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misinterpretation and misuse of exposure limits.
    Hewett P
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Feb; 16(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 11217719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occupational exposure limits in Europe and Asia--continued divergence or global harmonization?
    Ding Q; Schenk L; Malkiewicz K; Hansson SO
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3):296-309. PubMed ID: 21907258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Industry Derived Occupational Exposure Limits: A Survey of Professionals on the Dutch System of Exposure Guidelines.
    Schenk L; Visser MJ; Palmen NGM
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Nov; 63(9):1004-1012. PubMed ID: 31504142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the health implications for healthcare workers of regulatory changes eliminating locally developed occupational exposure limits in favor of TLVs: an evidence-based bipartite approach.
    Bigelow P; Moore D; Yassi A
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2004; 10(4):433-44. PubMed ID: 15702759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
    Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 18226844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in China.
    Liang Y; Wong O; Yang L; Li T; Su Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16624464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific and practical considerations for the development of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for chemical substances.
    Galer DM; Leung HW; Sussman RG; Trzos RJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1992 Jun; 15(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 1509122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Will worker DNELs derived under the European REACH regulation extend the landscape of occupational exposure guidance values?
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 May; 93(5):1187-1200. PubMed ID: 30993379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New trends in the development of occupational exposure limits for airborne chemicals in China.
    Liang YX; Su Z; Wu WA; Lu BQ; Fu WZ; Yang L; Gu JY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Oct; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 14550754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Paek D; Park DY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 16564609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are occupational exposure limits becoming more alike within the European Union?
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):858-66. PubMed ID: 18381691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative property-property relationships for computing occupational exposure limits and vapour hazard ratios of organic solvents.
    Debia M; Krishnan K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):583-601. PubMed ID: 21120751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting occupational exposure limits for antimicrobial agents: A case study based on a quaternary ammonium compound-based disinfectant.
    Dotson GS; Lotter JT; Zisook RE; Gaffney SH; Maier A; Colvin J
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2020 Sep; 36(9):619-633. PubMed ID: 33241765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metalworking fluid mist occupational exposure limits: a discussion of alternative methods.
    Cohen H; White EM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):501-7. PubMed ID: 16857649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.