490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26099485)
1. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Missing binary data extraction challenges from Cochrane reviews in mental health and Campbell reviews with implications for empirical research.
Spineli LM
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):514-525. PubMed ID: 28961395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor.
Spineli LM; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Schünemann HJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 30355280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey.
Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis: the reporting and handling of missing data in composite outcomes.
Ibrahim F; Tom BD; Scott DL; Prevost AT
Trials; 2016 Jun; 17(1):272. PubMed ID: 27255212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
Kirkham JJ; Dwan KM; Altman DG; Gamble C; Dodd S; Smyth R; Williamson PR
BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c365. PubMed ID: 20156912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From narrative to systematic reviews and meta-analyses in assessing the effectiveness of psychiatric treatments.
Tansella M
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2003; 12(3):135-6. PubMed ID: 14610847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews].
Davoli M; Amato L; Minozzi S; Bargagli AM; Vecchi S; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2005; 29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. PubMed ID: 16529350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses.
Garcia-Alamino JM; Bankhead C; Heneghan C; Pidduck N; Perera R
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015888. PubMed ID: 29122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health-related interventions.
Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Gilbody SM; Trikalinos TA; Churchill R; Wahlbeck K; Ioannidis JP
Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Mar; 162(3):578-84. PubMed ID: 15741476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Green SE; Forbes AB
Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; 2():21. PubMed ID: 23575367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
