230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26099528)
1. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.
Chalkidou K; Tunis S; Whicher D; Fowler R; Zwarenstein M
Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 22752634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
Sox HC; Goodman SN
Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma.
Krishnan JA; Schatz M; Apter AJ
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2011 Jan; 127(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 20855111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can CER be an effective tool for change in the development and assessment of new drugs and technologies?
Brixner DI; Watkins JB
J Manag Care Pharm; 2012 Jun; 18(5 Supp A):S06-11. PubMed ID: 22663293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages for comparative effectiveness research? Protocol for the RE-ADAPT study.
Connor JT; Luce BR; Broglio KR; Ishak KJ; Mullins CD; Vanness DJ; Fleurence R; Saunders E; Davis BR
Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):807-27. PubMed ID: 23983160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of clinical trials in comparative effectiveness research on mental health.
Blanco C; Rafful C; Olfson M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S29-36. PubMed ID: 23849150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A point-of-care clinical trial comparing insulin administered using a sliding scale versus a weight-based regimen.
Fiore LD; Brophy M; Ferguson RE; D'Avolio L; Hermos JA; Lew RA; Doros G; Conrad CH; O'Neil JA; Sabin TP; Kaufman J; Swartz SL; Lawler E; Liang MH; Gaziano JM; Lavori PW
Clin Trials; 2011 Apr; 8(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 21478329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of private industry in pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials.
Buesching DP; Luce BR; Berger ML
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Mar; 1(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 24237375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Armstrong K
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4208-14. PubMed ID: 23071240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
Witt CM
J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effectiveness research paradigm: implications for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Brouwers MC; Thabane L; Moher D; Straus SE
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4202-7. PubMed ID: 23071227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
