315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26099528)
21. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of private industry in pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials.
Buesching DP; Luce BR; Berger ML
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Mar; 1(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 24237375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
Witt CM
J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Registry-based randomized controlled trials- what are the advantages, challenges, and areas for future research?
Li G; Sajobi TT; Menon BK; Korngut L; Lowerison M; James M; Wilton SB; Williamson T; Gill S; Drogos LL; Smith EE; Vohra S; Hill MD; Thabane L;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():16-24. PubMed ID: 27555082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative effectiveness research paradigm: implications for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Brouwers MC; Thabane L; Moher D; Straus SE
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4202-7. PubMed ID: 23071227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implementing CER: what will it take?
Biskupiak JE; Dunn JD; Holtorf AP
J Manag Care Pharm; 2012 Jun; 18(5 Supp A):S19-29. PubMed ID: 22663296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report.
Berger ML; Dreyer N; Anderson F; Towse A; Sedrakyan A; Normand SL
Value Health; 2012; 15(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 22433752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Respiratory Disease: Promise and Pitfalls.
Ramos KJ; Somayaji R; Nichols DP; Goss CH
Paediatr Drugs; 2018 Feb; 20(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28776129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role and impact of research agendas on the comparative-effectiveness research among antihyperlipidemics.
Dunn AG; Bourgeois FT; Murthy S; Mandl KD; Day RO; Coiera E
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Apr; 91(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 22378152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Overview of design, implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research].
Liao X; Xie YM; Tian F; Shen H
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 38(6):930-5. PubMed ID: 23717982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Complex questions command complex analyses: comparative effectiveness of drug treatment strategies in atrial fibrillation.
Ionescu-Ittu R; Pilote L
J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24236513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Group sequential designs for developing and testing biomarker-guided personalized therapies in comparative effectiveness research.
Lai TL; Liao OY; Kim DW
Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Nov; 36(2):651-63. PubMed ID: 23994669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative effectiveness research (CER): a summary of AHRQ's CER on therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.
Oderda GM; Balfe LM
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl B):S19-24. PubMed ID: 22073936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
Fischer MA; Allen-Coleman C; Farrell SF; Schneeweiss S
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26388438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Building useful evidence: changing the clinical research paradigm to account for comparative effectiveness research.
Greenfield S; Kaplan SH
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 23577230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the phase III clinical trial designs of novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: implications for clinical practice.
Gonzalez-Quesada CJ; Giugliano RP
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2014 Apr; 14(2):111-27. PubMed ID: 24504768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. New methods for determining comparative effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis.
Yun H; Curtis JR
Curr Opin Rheumatol; 2013 May; 25(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 23508131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
