These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2610010)
21. Determinants of adherence among health department patients referred for a mammogram. Crane LA; Kaplan CP; Bastani R; Scrimshaw SC Women Health; 1996; 24(2):43-64. PubMed ID: 8948085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of a media-based mammography program. Mayer JA; Kossman MK; Miller LC; Crooks CE; Slymen DJ; Lee CD Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 1575997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Going the distance: how far will women travel to undergo free mammography? Brustrom JE; Hunter DC Mil Med; 2001 Apr; 166(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 11315478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Customer fee and participation in breast-cancer screening. Immonen-Räihä P; Kauhava L; Parvinen I; Helenius H; Klemi P Lancet; 2001 Oct; 358(9291):1425. PubMed ID: 11705491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The self-referred mammography patient: a new responsibility for radiologists. Monsees B; Destouet JM; Evens RG Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):69-70. PubMed ID: 3336703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of a nurse practitioner-staffed preventive medicine program in a fee-for-service multispecialty clinic. Brown JD; Brown MI; Jones F Prev Med; 1979 Jan; 8(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 424380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Germany will penalise cancer patients who do not undergo regular screening. Tuffs A BMJ; 2006 Oct; 333(7574):877. PubMed ID: 17068029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [The doctor and his "fee" between ingratitude and submission]. Nau JY Rev Med Suisse; 2016 Jan; 12(503):236-7. PubMed ID: 26939199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Variation in prices for common medical tests and procedures. Aliferis L JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 175(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 25402262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The sight test fee. Abolish charges for elderly people. Hillman JG BMJ; 1994 Nov; 309(6965):1371-2. PubMed ID: 7866099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A new program for sharing medical cost information. Redberg RF JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 175(1):13. PubMed ID: 25402948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The sight test fee. Need for more cautious analysis. Gardner JM BMJ; 1994 Nov; 309(6965):1370; author reply 1372. PubMed ID: 7866094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The sight test fee. 1988 data may be misleading. Pooley J; Woodward EG; Cooling R BMJ; 1994 Nov; 309(6965):1370; author reply 1372. PubMed ID: 7866096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The sight test fee. Relatives at risk can have free test. Gray PJ BMJ; 1994 Nov; 309(6965):1370-1; author reply 1372. PubMed ID: 7866097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The sight test fee. Similar experience in Leeds. Hawksworth NR; Hillman JS BMJ; 1994 Nov; 309(6965):1371; author reply 1372. PubMed ID: 7866098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. New fee structure for police surgeons. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jan; 286(6361):324. PubMed ID: 20741966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]