These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26100936)

  • 1. Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time-Consistent?
    Tentori K; Chater N; Crupi V
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):758-78. PubMed ID: 26100936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Evidential Impact on Perceptual Probabilistic Judgments.
    Mangiarulo M; Pighin S; Polonio L; Tentori K
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12919. PubMed ID: 33398915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whose statistical reasoning is facilitated by a causal structure intervention?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):258-64. PubMed ID: 24825305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deductive updating is not Bayesian.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):949-56. PubMed ID: 25603167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When I think about me and simulate you: medial rostral prefrontal cortex and self-referential processes.
    Benoit RG; Gilbert SJ; Volle E; Burgess PW
    Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 20045478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Category-based induction from similarity of neural activation.
    Weber MJ; Osherson D
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 14(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 24254747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causality in thought.
    Sloman SA; Lagnado D
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():223-47. PubMed ID: 25061673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast similarities: efficiency advantages of similarity-focused comparisons.
    Corcoran K; Epstude K; Damisch L; Mussweiler T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1280-6. PubMed ID: 21707213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Zero-Sum Fallacy in Evidence Evaluation.
    Pilditch TD; Fenton N; Lagnado D
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Feb; 30(2):250-260. PubMed ID: 30597122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
    Lassiter D; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():123-34. PubMed ID: 25497521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of base rates and new information in an abstract hypothesis-testing task.
    Rusconi P; Marelli M; Russo S; D'Addario M; Cherubini P
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 23560666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptance, values, and probability.
    Steel D
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Oct; 53():81-8. PubMed ID: 26386533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Popper and the problem of induction in epidemiology].
    Banegas JR; Rodríguez Artalejo F; del Rey Calero J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 11031841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.