250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26100945)
21. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the value of intraoperative frozen sections.
Dillenburg W; Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Skriapas K; Altmansberger HM; Becht E
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):614-21. PubMed ID: 16054291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Keller EX; Bachofner J; Britschgi AJ; Saba K; Mortezavi A; Kaufmann B; Fankhauser CD; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D; Poyet C
World J Urol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 30519744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section.
Tully KH; Schulmeyer M; Hanske J; Reike MJ; Brock M; Moritz R; Jütte H; Tannapfel A; von Bodman C; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ; Roghmann F
BJU Int; 2021 Nov; 128(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 33961328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Cangiano TG; Litwin MS; Naitoh J; Dorey F; deKernion JB
J Urol; 1999 Sep; 162(3 Pt 1):655-8. PubMed ID: 10458335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Periprostatic tissues intraoperative frozen section during retrograde radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Fasolis G; Degiuli P; Lancia M; Fasolo PP; Conti E; Sebastiani G; Lacquaniti S
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2006 Sep; 78(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 17137025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre: Oncologic and functional outcomes].
Beauval JB; Roumiguié M; Ouali M; Doumerc N; Thoulouzan M; Mazerolles C; Rischmann P; Malavaud B; Soulié M
Prog Urol; 2015 Jun; 25(7):370-8. PubMed ID: 25937373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of intra-operative bladder neck frozen sections.
Nakamura K; Kasraeian A; Anai S; Pendleton J; Rosser CJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 18199342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Use of frozen sections to assess surgical margins during radical prostatectomy].
Varvello F; Conti E; Camilli M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
Urologia; 2013 Apr; 80 Suppl 22():39-43. PubMed ID: 23334884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy.
Michl U; Tennstedt P; Feldmeier L; Mandel P; Oh SJ; Ahyai S; Budäus L; Chun FKH; Haese A; Heinzer H; Salomon G; Schlomm T; Steuber T; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 26277303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.
Mirmilstein G; Rai BP; Gbolahan O; Srirangam V; Narula A; Agarwal S; Lane TM; Vasdev N; Adshead J
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 29124889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
