BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26101170)

  • 21. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. One size does not fit all: universal cuff overestimates oscillometric blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.
    Bovien Gørlitz K; Laugesen E; Trolle C; Nørgård LJ; Lajlev S; Colombo M; Bohl M; Hansen KW
    Blood Press; 2024 Dec; 33(1):2338208. PubMed ID: 38591393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inaccuracies introduced by single width blood pressure cuffs.
    Andrews JC; Dewitt B; Czerwien TE; Bijelic M; Latman NS
    Hypertens Res; 2011 Feb; 34(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 21048776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
    Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
    Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Cuff Size on the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Readings: The Cuff(SZ) Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Ishigami J; Charleston J; Miller ER; Matsushita K; Appel LJ; Brady TM
    JAMA Intern Med; 2023 Oct; 183(10):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 37548984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cuff challenges in blood pressure measurement.
    Palatini P; Asmar R
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2018 Jul; 20(7):1100-1103. PubMed ID: 30003699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of the BP A100 blood pressure measuring device coupled with a single cuff with standard-size bladder over a wide range of arm circumferences.
    Bonso E; Dorigatti F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):216-9. PubMed ID: 19734782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
    Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
    Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
    Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An optical oscillometric method for neonatal and premature infant blood pressure monitoring.
    Roeder RA; Geddes LA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19363328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Blood pressure measurement by oscillometric and auscultatory methods in normotensive pregnant women.
    Vigato ES; Lamas JLT
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2019 Dec; 72(suppl 3):162-169. PubMed ID: 31851249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Discarding the first of three nurse-auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 20407368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of arm circumference on noninvasive oscillometric blood pressure referenced with intra-aortic blood pressure.
    Shangguan Q; Wu Y; Xu J; Su H; Li J; Hong K; Cheng X
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Dec; 20(6):316-9. PubMed ID: 26110370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single cuff comparison of two methods for indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure: standard auscultatory method versus automatic oscillometric method.
    Pessenhofer H
    Basic Res Cardiol; 1986; 81(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 3718426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is one measurement enough to evaluate blood pressure among adolescents? A blood pressure screening experience in more than 9000 children with a subset comparison of auscultatory to mercury measurements.
    Negroni-Balasquide X; Bell CS; Samuel J; Samuels JA
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Feb; 10(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biases in the measurement of arterial pressure.
    Finnie KJ; Watts DG; Armstrong PW
    Crit Care Med; 1984 Nov; 12(11):965-8. PubMed ID: 6499482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.