These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26101282)
21. Sizing up the evidence. Servick K Science; 2016 Mar; 351(6278):1130-2. PubMed ID: 26965601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Forensic science in the context of Islamic law: A review. Alkahtani T; Aljerian K; Golding B; Alqahtani S J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Aug; 34():179-81. PubMed ID: 26165681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature]. Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Organization of expert support of criminal investigation under condition of hostilities]. Dmitriev EG; Kolkutin VV Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(3):31-5. PubMed ID: 18589674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Forensic science standards in fast-changing environments. Sommer P Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 20408377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A call for more science in forensic science. Bell S; Sah S; Albright TD; Gates SJ; Denton MB; Casadevall A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(18):4541-4544. PubMed ID: 29650539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Time to think differently: catalysing a paradigm shift in forensic science. Black S; Nic Daeid N Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Psychiatric evidence on trial. Davoli JI SMU Law Rev; 2003; 56(4):2191-234. PubMed ID: 14689986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence. Thompson WC; Scurich N J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings. Jackson G; Jones S; Booth G; Champod C; Evett IW Sci Justice; 2006; 46(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 16878783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. What do the experts know? Calibration, precision, and the wisdom of crowds among forensic handwriting experts. Martire KA; Growns B; Navarro DJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2346-2355. PubMed ID: 29667124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The forensic expert witness--an issue of competency. Hiss J; Freund M; Kahana T Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(2-3):89-94. PubMed ID: 16842948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Forensic sciences (anthropology/archaeology/pathology) and international criminal justice. Fournet C Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):303-304. PubMed ID: 27702445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Founding editorial--forensics and TheScientificWorld. Rowe W ScientificWorldJournal; 2001 Oct; 1():605-8. PubMed ID: 12805857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect. Martire KA; Kemp RI; Sayle M; Newell BR Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():61-8. PubMed ID: 24814330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Autism spectrum disorder: forensic issues and challenges for mental health professionals and courts. Freckelton I J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2013 Sep; 26(5):420-34. PubMed ID: 23925965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of pharmacological evidence for forensic purposes. Aronson JK Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 22436254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Peterson JL; Hickman MJ; Strom KJ; Johnson DJ J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S78-90. PubMed ID: 23106604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]