229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26101357)
1. Comparative Effectiveness Research Through a Collaborative Electronic Reporting Consortium.
Fiks AG; Grundmeier RW; Steffes J; Adams WG; Kaelber DC; Pace WD; Wasserman RC;
Pediatrics; 2015 Jul; 136(1):e215-24. PubMed ID: 26101357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.
Hazlehurst BL; Kurtz SE; Masica A; Stevens VJ; McBurnie MA; Puro JE; Vijayadeva V; Au DH; Brannon ED; Sittig DF
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):763-73. PubMed ID: 26138036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Challenges in using electronic health record data for CER: experience of 4 learning organizations and solutions applied.
Bayley KB; Belnap T; Savitz L; Masica AL; Shah N; Fleming NS
Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8 Suppl 3):S80-6. PubMed ID: 23774512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness research in DARTNet primary care practices: point of care data collection on hypoglycemia and over-the-counter and herbal use among patients diagnosed with diabetes.
Libby AM; Pace W; Bryan C; Anderson HO; Ellis SL; Allen RR; Brandt E; Huebschmann AG; West D; Valuck RJ
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S39-44. PubMed ID: 20473193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pediatricians' use of health information technology: a national survey.
Leu MG; O'Connor KG; Marshall R; Price DT; Klein JD
Pediatrics; 2012 Dec; 130(6):e1441-6. PubMed ID: 23166335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care.
Miriovsky BJ; Shulman LN; Abernethy AP
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4243-8. PubMed ID: 23071233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating collaborations in comparative effectiveness research: opportunities and challenges for social network analysis.
Zickafoose JS; Kimmey LD; Tomas A; Esposito D; Rich E
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 25494573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.
Huang GD; Ferguson RE; Peduzzi PN; O'Leary TJ
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. PubMed ID: 21184863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).
Holve E; Segal C; Lopez MH; Rein A; Johnson BH
Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S7-10. PubMed ID: 22692262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pediatric collaborative improvement networks: background and overview.
Lannon CM; Peterson LE
Pediatrics; 2013 Jun; 131 Suppl 4():S189-95. PubMed ID: 23729759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum.
Holve E; Segal C; Hamilton Lopez M
Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S11-8. PubMed ID: 22692252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationale and design of the STAR randomized controlled trial to accelerate adoption of childhood obesity comparative effectiveness research.
Taveras EM; Marshall R; Horan CM; Gillman MW; Hacker K; Kleinman KP; Koziol R; Price S; Simon SR
Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Jan; 34(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 23099100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results: Survey of pediatric urology electronic medical records-use and perspectives.
Canon SJ; Purifoy JA; Heulitt GM; Hogan W; Swearingen C; Williams M; Alpert S; Young D
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4 Suppl):1740-4. PubMed ID: 21862073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Creation and evaluation of a multi-layered maternal and child health database for comparative effectiveness research.
Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Bailey M; Mbah AK; Salihu HM
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):14-28. PubMed ID: 23778693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ISPE-Endorsed Guidance in Using Electronic Health Records for Comparative Effectiveness Research in COVID-19: Opportunities and Trade-Offs.
Sarri G; Bennett D; Debray T; Deruaz-Luyet A; Soriano Gabarró M; Largent JA; Li X; Liu W; Lund JL; Moga DC; Gokhale M; Rentsch CT; Wen X; Yanover C; Ye Y; Yun H; Zullo AR; Lin KJ
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2022 Nov; 112(5):990-999. PubMed ID: 35170021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
Witt CM
J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
