These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26102185)

  • 1. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Responders' Gender Stereotypes Modulate the Strategic Decision-Making of Proposers Playing the Ultimatum Game.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():12. PubMed ID: 26834684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On feelings as a heuristic for making offers in ultimatum negotiations.
    Stephen AT; Pham MT
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19000217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness.
    Zheng Y; Cheng X; Xu J; Zheng L; Li L; Yang G; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():847. PubMed ID: 28611705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
    Koenigs M; Tranel D
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining.
    Weiland S; Hewig J; Hecht H; Mussel P; Miltner WH
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(5):537-51. PubMed ID: 22443447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.
    Kubota JT; Li J; Bar-David E; Banaji MR; Phelps EA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2498-504. PubMed ID: 24121413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
    Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heartbeat and economic decisions: observing mental stress among proposers and responders in the ultimatum bargaining game.
    Dulleck U; Schaffner M; Torgler B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108218. PubMed ID: 25247817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mentalizing in economic decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Daum I; Rubaltelli E; Lotto L; Civai C; Sartori G; Rumiati R
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 190(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 18406476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The involvement of rTPJ in intention attribution during social decision making: A TMS study.
    Panico F; Ferrara A; Sagliano L; Trojano L
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Aug; 24(4):755-765. PubMed ID: 38689164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.