These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26102230)

  • 1. Evidence of Change of Intention in Picking Situations.
    Furstenberg A; Breska A; Sompolinsky H; Deouell LY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2133-46. PubMed ID: 26102230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Aging on Change of Intention.
    Furstenberg A; Dewar CD; Sompolinsky H; Knight RT; Deouell LY
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():264. PubMed ID: 31417383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The neural correlates of intending not to do something.
    Kühn S; Gevers W; Brass M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 101(4):1913-20. PubMed ID: 19164107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing to Stop: Responses Evoked by Externally Triggered and Internally Generated Inhibition Identify a Neural Mechanism of Will.
    Parkinson J; Haggard P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1948-56. PubMed ID: 26042503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related potentials elicited by unexpected visual stimuli after voluntary actions.
    Adachi S; Morikawa K; Nittono H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Dec; 66(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17888536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Payoff Information Biases a Fast Guess Process in Perceptual Decision Making under Deadline Pressure: Evidence from Behavior, Evoked Potentials, and Quantitative Model Comparison.
    Noorbaloochi S; Sharon D; McClelland JL
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(31):10989-1011. PubMed ID: 26245962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Autonomous mechanism of internal choice estimate underlies decision inertia.
    Akaishi R; Umeda K; Nagase A; Sakai K
    Neuron; 2014 Jan; 81(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 24333055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of a choice-reaction task yields a new interpretation of Libet's experiments.
    Herrmann CS; Pauen M; Min BK; Busch NA; Rieger JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18096261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masked prime stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives.
    Schlaghecken F; Eimer M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):463-8. PubMed ID: 15376796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociable neural correlates of intention and action preparation in voluntary task switching.
    Poljac E; Yeung N
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Feb; 24(2):465-78. PubMed ID: 23104682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task alternation cost without task alternation: measuring intentionality.
    Yehene E; Meiran N; Soroker N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1858-69. PubMed ID: 16168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classic EEG motor potentials track the emergence of value-based decisions.
    Gluth S; Rieskamp J; Büchel C
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():394-403. PubMed ID: 23664943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural and temporal dynamics underlying visual selection for action.
    van Elk M; van Schie HT; Neggers SF; Bekkering H
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Aug; 104(2):972-83. PubMed ID: 20538783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus-response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials.
    Meiran N; Pereg M; Kessler Y; Cole MW; Braver TS
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 15(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 25216992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct electrophysiological potentials for intention in action and prior intention for action.
    Vinding MC; Jensen M; Overgaard M
    Cortex; 2014 Jan; 50():86-99. PubMed ID: 24113032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation.
    van Schie HT; Mars RB; Coles MG; Bekkering H
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 May; 7(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 15107858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On-line executive control: an electromyographic study.
    Allain S; Carbonnell L; Burle B; Hasbroucq T; Vidal F
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 14693006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unconscious and out of control: subliminal priming is insensitive to observer expectations.
    Cressman EK; Lam MY; Franks IM; Enns JT; Chua R
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):716-28. PubMed ID: 23703024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of aging on slowing of motor-response generation.
    Falkenstein M; Yordanova J; Kolev V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 16257076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.