150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26102407)
21. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
Arponen O; Sudah M; Masarwah A; Taina M; Rautiainen S; Könönen M; Sironen R; Kosma VM; Sutela A; Hakumäki J; Vanninen R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0138702. PubMed ID: 26458106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diffusion-weighted MRI and optimal b-value for characterization of liver lesions.
Kaya B; Koc Z
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jun; 55(5):532-42. PubMed ID: 23982322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values.
Kandpal H; Sharma R; Madhusudhan KS; Kapoor KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):915-22. PubMed ID: 19304695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation between two-point and multipoint B value analyses in prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue at 3 T: preliminary experience.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park BK; Kwon GY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W287-94. PubMed ID: 25148186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differentiation of malignant from benign focal splenic lesions: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI.
Jang KM; Kim SH; Hwang J; Lee SJ; Kang TW; Lee MW; Choi D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):803-12. PubMed ID: 25247945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatic lesions.
Miller FH; Hammond N; Siddiqi AJ; Shroff S; Khatri G; Wang Y; Merrick LB; Nikolaidis P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 20578020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diffusion weighted imaging of liver lesions suspect for metastases: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion contrast are independent from Gd-EOB-DTPA administration.
Benndorf M; Schelhorn J; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e849-53. PubMed ID: 22575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characterization of indeterminate soft tissue masses referred for biopsy: What is the added value of contrast imaging at 3.0 tesla?
Del Grande F; Ahlawat S; Subhawong T; Fayad LM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):390-400. PubMed ID: 27417663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of ADC measurement in differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions.
Onur MR; Çiçekçi M; Kayalı A; Poyraz AK; Kocakoç E
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e171-6. PubMed ID: 21353418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and apparent diffusion coefficient techniques for predicting malignancy of head and neck tumors using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging.
Sakamoto J; Imaizumi A; Sasaki Y; Kamio T; Wakoh M; Otonari-Yamamoto M; Sano T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):860-6. PubMed ID: 24832359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility of measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients of malignant hepatic tumors: effect of DWI techniques and calculation methods.
Kim SY; Lee SS; Park B; Kim N; Kim JK; Park SH; Byun JH; Song KJ; Koo JH; Choi EK; Lee MG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1131-8. PubMed ID: 22777895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value.
Gity M; Moradi B; Arami R; Arabkheradmand A; Kazemi MA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Oct; 19(10):2765-2770. PubMed ID: 30360604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diffusion-weighted MRI of malignant pleural mesothelioma: preliminary assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in histologic subtypes.
Gill RR; Umeoka S; Mamata H; Tilleman TR; Stanwell P; Woodhams R; Padera RF; Sugarbaker DJ; Hatabu H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):W125-30. PubMed ID: 20651171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast DWI at 3 T: influence of the fat-suppression technique on image quality and diagnostic performance.
Nogueira L; Brandão S; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I
Clin Radiol; 2015 Mar; 70(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 25555315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions in diffusion-weighted MRI.
Şahin C; Arıbal E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 24004972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Mutlu H; Sivrioglu AK; Sonmez G; Velioglu M; Sildiroglu HO; Basekim CC; Kizilkaya E
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22226435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimization of b value in diffusion-weighted MRI for characterization of benign and malignant gynecological lesions.
Koc Z; Erbay G; Ulusan S; Seydaoglu G; Aka-Bolat F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Mar; 35(3):650-9. PubMed ID: 22069238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
