These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26103172)

  • 21. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
    Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Objective comparison of high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability for various clinical protocols on multiple CT scanners.
    Racine D; Viry A; Becce F; Schmidt S; Ba A; Bochud FO; Edyvean S; Schegerer A; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e153-e163. PubMed ID: 28901621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phantom studies for possible dose reduction in CT head procedures.
    Staniszewska MA; Obrzut M; Rybka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):326-31. PubMed ID: 15933131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.
    Birnbaum BA; Hindman N; Lee J; Babb JS
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 17185663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiation Dose Consideration in Kidney Stone CT Examinations: Integration of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms With Routine Clinical Practice.
    Andrabi Y; Pianykh O; Agrawal M; Kambadakone A; Blake MA; Sahani DV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 25905941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
    Martin CJ; Sookpeng S
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):R74-R95. PubMed ID: 27485613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography.
    International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements
    J ICRU; 2012 Apr; 12(1):1-149. PubMed ID: 24158924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CT number variations due to different image acquisition and reconstruction parameters: a thorax phantom study.
    Groell R; Rienmueller R; Schaffler GJ; Portugaller HR; Graif E; Willfurth P
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 10767584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CT equipment and performance issues: radiation protection 162.
    Edyvean S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23188810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dosimetric characterization and image quality evaluation of the AIRO mobile CT scanner.
    Weir VJ; Zhang J; Bruner AP
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 26410470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Precision of quantitative computed tomography texture analysis using image filtering: A phantom study for scanner variability.
    Yasaka K; Akai H; Mackin D; Court L; Moros E; Ohtomo K; Kiryu S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 May; 96(21):e6993. PubMed ID: 28538408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT)].
    Blendl C; Fiebich M; Voigt JM; Selbach M; Uphoff C
    Rofo; 2012 Jan; 184(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22076796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.
    Larson DB; Wang LL; Podberesky DJ; Goske MJ
    Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 23784878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
    Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT radiation dose and image quality optimization using a porcine model.
    Zarb F; McEntee MF; Rainford L
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 24255137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of CT-based texture features: Phantom study.
    Varghese BA; Hwang D; Cen SY; Levy J; Liu D; Lau C; Rivas M; Desai B; Goodenough DJ; Duddalwar VA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):155-163. PubMed ID: 31222919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal acquisition parameter selection for CT simulators in radiation oncology.
    Liu RR; Prado KL; Cody D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 9(4):151-160. PubMed ID: 19020491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.