606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26103470)
1. Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning.
Chamberland E; Beaulieu L; Lachance B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):4636. PubMed ID: 26103470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm.
Zhang A; Wen N; Nurushev T; Burmeister J; Chetty IJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 14(2):4062. PubMed ID: 23470937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Eclipse eMC algorithm for bolus electron conformal therapy using a standard verification dataset.
Carver RL; Sprunger CP; Hogstrom KR; Popple RA; Antolak JA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):52-60. PubMed ID: 27167259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generalized eMC implementation for Monte Carlo dose calculation of electron beams from different machine types.
Fix MK; Cygler J; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2841-59. PubMed ID: 23563175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the presence of heterogeneities using EGSnrc and radiochromic film measurements.
Aubry JF; Bouchard H; Bessières I; Lacroix F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 12(4):3392. PubMed ID: 22088999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm.
Fragoso M; Pillai S; Solberg TD; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1028-38. PubMed ID: 18404938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams.
Vandervoort EJ; Tchistiakova E; La Russa DJ; Cygler JE
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021711. PubMed ID: 24506602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
Treutwein M; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron treatment planning.
Huang JY; Dunkerley D; Smilowitz JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):184-193. PubMed ID: 31120615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verification of a commercial implementation of the Macro-Monte-Carlo electron dose calculation algorithm using the virtual accelerator approach.
Tertel J; Wulff J; Karle H; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2010; 20(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 20211424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a commercial electron treatment planning system based on Monte Carlo techniques (eMC).
Pemler P; Besserer J; Schneider U; Neuenschwander H
Z Med Phys; 2006; 16(4):313-29. PubMed ID: 17216757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric verification of a commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning system (VMC++) for a 9 MeV electron beam.
Schiapparelli P; Zefiro D; Taccini G
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1759-67. PubMed ID: 19544794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
