159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26103486)
1. Evaluation of patient DVH-based QA metrics for prostate VMAT: correlation between accuracy of estimated 3D patient dose and magnitude of MLC misalignment.
Kadoya N; Saito M; Ogasawara M; Fujita Y; Ito K; Sato K; Kishi K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Jingu K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5251. PubMed ID: 26103486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of DVH-based plan verification methods for VMAT: ArcCHECK-3DVH system and dynalog-based dose reconstruction.
Saito M; Kadoya N; Sato K; Ito K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Onishi H; Jingu K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 28649722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA.
Zhen H; Nelms BE; Tome WA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5477-89. PubMed ID: 21992366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial experience of ArcCHECK and 3DVH software for RapidArc treatment plan verification.
Infusino E; Mameli A; Conti R; Gaudino D; Stimato G; Bellesi L; D'Angelillo RM; Ramella S; Benassi M; Trodella L
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 25088815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Li G; Bai S; Chen N; Henderson L; Wu K; Xiao J; Zhang Y; Jiang Q; Jiang X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):13-24. PubMed ID: 24036856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing measurement-derived (3DVH) and machine log file-derived dose reconstruction methods for VMAT QA in patient geometries.
Tyagi N; Yang K; Yan D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4645. PubMed ID: 25207396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance.
Saito M; Sano N; Shibata Y; Kuriyama K; Komiyama T; Marino K; Aoki S; Ashizawa K; Yoshizawa K; Onishi H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):87-93. PubMed ID: 29500857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA.
Woon W; Ravindran PB; Ekayanake P; S V; Lim YY; Khalid J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):230-248. PubMed ID: 29460465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of one algorithm used to modify a planned DVH with data from actual dose delivery.
Ma T; Podgorsak MB; Kumaraswamy LK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):273-282. PubMed ID: 27685140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of residual dose estimation error on log file-based patient dose calculation.
Katsuta Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Shimizu E; Matsunaga K; Matsushita H; Majima K; Jingu K
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):701-5. PubMed ID: 27162084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VMAT QA: measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient.
Nelms BE; Opp D; Robinson J; Wolf TK; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4228-38. PubMed ID: 22830756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume-based 3D gamma indices.
Han C; Yu W; Zheng X; Zhou Y; Gong C; Xie C; Jin X
J Radiat Res; 2018 Sep; 59(5):669-676. PubMed ID: 30085157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomy-based, patient-specific VMAT QA using EPID or MLC log files.
Defoor DL; Vazquez-Quino LA; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5283. PubMed ID: 26103490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D DVH-based metric analysis versus per-beam planar analysis in IMRT pretreatment verification.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Latorre A; Eudaldo T; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5040-9. PubMed ID: 22894429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
