129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26103498)
21. Treatment plan complexity metrics for predicting IMRT pre-treatment quality assurance results.
Crowe SB; Kairn T; Kenny J; Knight RT; Hill B; Langton CM; Trapp JV
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 37(3):475-82. PubMed ID: 24810792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automatic treatment planning facilitates fast generation of high-quality treatment plans for esophageal cancer.
Hansen CR; Nielsen M; Bertelsen AS; Hazell I; Holtved E; Zukauskaite R; Bjerregaard JK; Brink C; Bernchou U
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1495-1500. PubMed ID: 28840767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of log file analysis within VMAT audits.
McGarry CK; Agnew CE; Hussein M; Tsang Y; Hounsell AR; Clark CH
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150489. PubMed ID: 27072390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A software tool to automatically assure and report daily treatment deliveries by a cobalt-60 radiation therapy device.
Yang D; Wooten HO; Green O; Li HH; Liu S; Li X; Rodriguez V; Mutic S; Kashani R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):492-501. PubMed ID: 27167269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technical Note: Development and performance of a software tool for quality assurance of online replanning with a conventional Linac or MR-Linac.
Chen GP; Ahunbay E; Li XA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1713. PubMed ID: 27036569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Commissioning Varian enhanced dynamic wedge in the PINNACLE treatment planning system using Gafchromic EBT film.
Fontanarosa D; Orlandini LC; Andriani I; Bernardi L
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4504-10. PubMed ID: 19928081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detailed review and analysis of complex radiotherapy clinical trial planning data: evaluation and initial experience with the SWAN software system.
Ebert MA; Haworth A; Kearvell R; Hooton B; Coleman R; Spry N; Bydder S; Joseph D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 18077034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A real time dose monitoring and dose reconstruction tool for patient specific VMAT QA and delivery.
Tyagi N; Yang K; Gersten D; Yan D
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7194-204. PubMed ID: 23231270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy: effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality assurance.
O'Daniel J; Das S; Wu QJ; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1567-74. PubMed ID: 21470797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interactively exploring optimized treatment plans.
Rosen I; Liu HH; Childress N; Liao Z
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):570-82. PubMed ID: 15667980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional gamma criterion for patient-specific quality assurance of spot scanning proton beams.
Chang C; Poole KL; Teran AV; Luckman S; Mah D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):381–388. PubMed ID: 26699329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical note: electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic.
Yang D; Wu Y; Brame RS; Yaddanapudi S; Rangaraj D; Li HH; Goddu SM; Mutic S
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4726-32. PubMed ID: 22894397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Practical implementation of quality improvement for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Schubert L; Liu A; Gan G; Amini A; Hutchison R; Ernest J; Thornton D; Stoehr S; Hinman B; Stuhr K; Westerly D; Schefter T; Fisher C
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2016; 6(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 26577008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Technical note: the development of quality assurance for Sheffield's radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
Whilde NJ; Conway J; Bomford CK
Br J Radiol; 1993 Dec; 66(792):1182-5. PubMed ID: 8293264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation therapy plan checks in a paperless clinic.
Siochi RA; Pennington EC; Waldron TJ; Bayouth JE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 10(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 19223840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Quality assurance and quality control for radiation treatment planning systems].
Tateoka K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 May; 60(5):607-16. PubMed ID: 15213686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Survey of tangential field planning and dose distribution in the UK: background to the introduction of the quality assurance programme for the START trial in early breast cancer.
Winfield EA; Deighton A; Venables K; Hoskin PJ; Aird EG;
Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):254-9. PubMed ID: 12711645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A dose delivery verification method for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using measured field fluence distributions.
Renner WD; Sarfaraz M; Earl MA; Yu CX
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2996-3005. PubMed ID: 14655947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
