BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26104076)

  • 1. Comparison of Brain Tumor Contrast-enhancement on T1-CUBE and 3D-SPGR Images.
    Majigsuren M; Abe T; Kageji T; Matsuzaki K; Takeuchi M; Iwamoto S; Otomi Y; Uyama N; Nagahiro S; Harada M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016; 15(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26104076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of lesion enhancement between BB Cube and 3D-SPGR images for brain tumors with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hasegawa H; Ashikaga R; Okajima K; Wakayama T; Miyoshi M; Nishimura Y; Murakami T
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):463-471. PubMed ID: 28540464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of metastatic brain tumor at 3 tesla: utility of T(1)-weighted SPACE compared with 2D spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequence.
    Komada T; Naganawa S; Ogawa H; Matsushima M; Kubota S; Kawai H; Fukatsu H; Ikeda M; Kawamura M; Sakurai Y; Maruyama K
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2008; 7(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18460844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Thick-Slab Overlapping MIP Images of Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1-Weighted CUBE for Detection of Intracranial Metastases: A Pilot Study for Comparison of Lesion Detection, Interpretation Time, and Sensitivity with Nonoverlapping CUBE MIP, CUBE, and Inversion-Recovery-Prepared Fast-Spoiled Gradient Recalled Brain Volume.
    Yoon BC; Saad AF; Rezaii P; Wintermark M; Zaharchuk G; Iv M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Sep; 39(9):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 30093483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Gd-DTPA-induced signal enhancements in rat brain C6 glioma among different pulse sequences in 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sato H; Enmi J; Teramoto N; Hayashi T; Yamamoto A; Tsuji T; Naito H; Iida H
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 18300142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Significance of Discrepancy between Arterial Spin Labeling Images and Contrast-enhanced Images in the Diagnosis of Brain Tumors.
    Abe T; Mizobuchi Y; Sako W; Irahara S; Otomi Y; Obama Y; Nakajima K; Khashbat D; Majigsuren M; Kageji T; Nagahiro S; Harada M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2015; 14(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 26104074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-Tesla imaging of the pituitary and parasellar region: T1-weighted 3-dimensional fast spin echo cube outperforms conventional 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lien RJ; Corcuera-Solano I; Pawha PS; Naidich TP; Tanenbaum LN
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 25978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo dual echo (3D-FSPGR-DE) with water reconstruction: preliminary experience with a novel pulse sequence for gadolinium-enhanced abdominal MR imaging.
    Low RN; Panchal N; Vu AT; Knowles A; Estkowski L; Slavens Z; Ma J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 28(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 18821620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state (FSPGR) using ultra magnetic field 3-Tesla MRI for optimal pulse sequences of T1-weighted imaging].
    Yamashita E; Iwata N; Kinoshita T; Ogawa T; Hirata Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Feb; 62(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 16520714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.
    Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging with isotropic resolution at 3 Tesla.
    Edelman RR; Dunkle E; Koktzoglou I; Griffin A; Russell EJ; Ankenbrandt W; Ragin A; Carrillo A
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 19060723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted identification of the central sulcus in patients with brain tumors using MRI.
    Uwano I; Kameda M; Inoue T; Nishimoto H; Fujiwara S; Hirooka R; Ogawa A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1242-9. PubMed ID: 18421684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast enhancement of intracranial lesions at 1.5 T: comparison among 2D spin echo, black-blood (BB) Cube, and BB Cube-FLAIR sequences.
    Im S; Ashikaga R; Yagyu Y; Wakayama T; Miyoshi M; Hyodo T; Imaoka I; Kumano S; Ishii K; Murakami T
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3175-86. PubMed ID: 25929942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions in detection of small brain metastasis at 3T MR imaging: comparison with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo imaging.
    Kato Y; Higano S; Tamura H; Mugikura S; Umetsu A; Murata T; Takahashi S
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 May; 30(5):923-9. PubMed ID: 19213825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast enhancement of intracranial lesions: conventional T1-weighted spin-echo versus fast spin-echo MR imaging techniques.
    Sugahara T; Korogi Y; Ge Y; Shigematsu Y; Liang L; Yoshizumi K; Kitajima M; Takahashi M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Sep; 20(8):1554-9. PubMed ID: 10512245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) imaging is superior to spin-echo imaging in delineating brain metastases.
    Takeda T; Takeda A; Nagaoka T; Kunieda E; Takemasa K; Watanabe M; Hatou T; Oguro S; Katayama M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1167-73. PubMed ID: 18979271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fat suppression at three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique.
    Kirchgesner T; Perlepe V; Michoux N; Larbi A; Vande Berg B
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Jan; 99(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 29054404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between contrast enhancement on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR sequences and signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: visual evaluation of brain tumors.
    Kubota T; Yamada K; Kizu O; Hirota T; Ito H; Ishihara K; Nishimura T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 15906343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Redefining normal facial nerve enhancement: healthy subject comparison of typical enhancement patterns--unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spin-echo versus 3D inversion recovery-prepared fast spoiled gradient-echo imaging.
    Dehkharghani S; Lubarsky M; Aiken AH; Kang J; Hudgins PA; Saindane AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):1108-13. PubMed ID: 24758667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.