147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2610421)
1. Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output.
Gotshall RW; Wood VC; Miles DS
Ann Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(5):495-505. PubMed ID: 2610421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Gotshall RW; Wood VC; Miles DS
Crit Care Med; 1989 Aug; 17(8):806-11. PubMed ID: 2752776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods.
Yakimets J; Jensen L
Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 7622393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impedance cardiography. Importance of the equation and the electrode configuration.
van der Meer BJ; Woltjer HH; Sousman AM; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM
Intensive Care Med; 1996 Oct; 22(10):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8923081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the accuracy of impedance cardiac output in the intensive care unit: comparison with thermodilution cardiac output.
Fuller HD
Congest Heart Fail; 2006; 12(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 17033276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between the transthoracic electrical impedance method and the direct Fick and the dye dilution methods for cardiac output measurements in man.
Enghoff E; Lövheim O
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1979 Oct; 39(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 394295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac output determinations in the pig--thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Jivegård L; Frid I; Haljamäe H; Holm J; Holm S; Wickström I
Crit Care Med; 1990 Sep; 18(9):995-8. PubMed ID: 2394124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of lung injury and excessive lung fluid, on impedance cardiac output measurements, in the critically ill.
Critchley LA; Calcroft RM; Tan PY; Kew J; Critchley JA
Intensive Care Med; 2000 Jun; 26(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 10945383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Bellows SA
Crit Care Med; 1990 Nov; 18(11):1306-7. PubMed ID: 2225908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.
Spiering W; van Es PN; de Leeuw PW
Heart; 1998 May; 79(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 9659188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of impedance cardiography.
Goldstein DS; Cannon RO; Zimlichman R; Keiser HR
Clin Physiol; 1986 Jun; 6(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 3087687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance or thermodilution].
Jacob F; Mariot J; Frisoni A; Perrier JF; Voltz C; Strub P; Ethévenot G
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1988; 7(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 3408040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of cardiac output using ensemble-averaged impedance cardiograms.
Muzi M; Ebert TJ; Tristani FE; Jeutter DC; Barney JA; Smith JJ
J Appl Physiol (1985); 1985 Jan; 58(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 3968011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: comparison of electrical bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques.
Smith SA; Russell AE; West MJ; Chalmers J
Br Heart J; 1988 Mar; 59(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3128316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of cardiac output measurement by computer-averaged impedance cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations.
Pickett BR; Buell JC
Am J Cardiol; 1992 May; 69(16):1354-8. PubMed ID: 1585872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ
Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output.
Donovan KD; Dobb GJ; Woods WP; Hockings BE
Crit Care Med; 1986 Dec; 14(12):1038-44. PubMed ID: 3780246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in the newborn canine.
Gotshall RW; Miles DS
Crit Care Med; 1989 Jan; 17(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 2909322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.
Thomas AN; Ryan J; Doran BR; Pollard BJ
Intensive Care Med; 1991; 17(7):383-6. PubMed ID: 1774390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology?
Van De Water JM; Miller TW; Vogel RL; Mount BE; Dalton ML
Chest; 2003 Jun; 123(6):2028-33. PubMed ID: 12796185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
