These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26104592)
1. Rate of change and predictive factors for increasing minus contact lens powers in young myopes. Kinoshita BT; Chalmers RL; Mitchell GL; Richdale K; Lam DY; Sorbara L; Jansen ME; Wagner H; Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Jul; 98(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 26104592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of the effect of soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Walline JJ; Jones LA; Sinnott L; Manny RE; Gaume A; Rah MJ; Chitkara M; Lyons S; Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 49(11):4702-6. PubMed ID: 18566461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Myopia progression during three years of soft contact lens wear. Blacker A; Mitchell GL; Bullimore MA; Long B; Barr JT; Dillehay SM; Bergenske P; Donshik P; Secor G; Yoakum J; Chalmers RL Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 86(10):1150-3. PubMed ID: 19741563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age and other risk factors for corneal infiltrative and inflammatory events in young soft contact lens wearers from the Contact Lens Assessment in Youth (CLAY) study. Chalmers RL; Wagner H; Mitchell GL; Lam DY; Kinoshita BT; Jansen ME; Richdale K; Sorbara L; McMahon TT Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(9):6690-6. PubMed ID: 21527379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for interruption to soft contact lens wear in children and young adults. Wagner H; Chalmers RL; Mitchell GL; Jansen ME; Kinoshita BT; Lam DY; McMahon TT; Richdale K; Sorbara L; Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):973-80. PubMed ID: 21602732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Near binocular visual function in young adult orthokeratology versus soft contact lens wearers. Gifford K; Gifford P; Hendicott PL; Schmid KL Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Jun; 40(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 28215499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective study of myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers. Bullimore MA; Jones LA; Moeschberger ML; Zadnik K; Payor RE Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(7):2110-3. PubMed ID: 12091404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rates of adverse events with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses in a large postmarket surveillance registry: the TEMPO Registry. Chalmers RL; Hickson-Curran SB; Keay L; Gleason WJ; Albright R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 56(1):654-63. PubMed ID: 25574042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses. Bergenske P; Long B; Dillehay S; Barr JT; Donshik P; Secor G; Yoakum J; Chalmers RL Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 17496699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Case Series Analysis of Myopic Progression Control With a Unique Extended Depth of Focus Multifocal Contact Lens. Cooper J; OʼConnor B; Watanabe R; Fuerst R; Berger S; Eisenberg N; Dillehay SM Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44(5):e16-e24. PubMed ID: 29053555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in Australian contact lens prescribing during the first decade of the 21st Century (2000-2009). Efron N; Morgan PB; Woods CA Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Jul; 93(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 20579080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact lens-related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used. Carnt NA; Evans VE; Naduvilath TJ; Willcox MD; Papas EB; Frick KD; Holden BA Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1616-23. PubMed ID: 20008717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of a soft contact lens to control myopia progression. Garcia-Del Valle AM; Blázquez V; Gros-Otero J; Infante M; Culebras A; Verdejo A; Sebastián J; García M; Bueno S; Piñero DP Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jan; 104(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 32342559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anomalies in the prescribing of soft contact lens power. Young G; Moody K; Sulley A Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jan; 35(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 19125042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adverse event rates in the retrospective cohort study of safety of paediatric soft contact lens wear: the ReCSS study. Chalmers RL; McNally JJ; Chamberlain P; Keay L Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Jan; 41(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 33179359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of patients who report compliant and non-compliant overnight wear of soft contact lenses. Jansen ME; Chalmers R; Mitchell GL; Kinoshita BT; Lam DY; McMahon TT; Richdale K; Sorbara L; Wagner H Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2011 Oct; 34(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 21345717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Silicone-acrylate contact lenses for myopia control: 3-year results. Perrigin J; Perrigin D; Quintero S; Grosvenor T Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Oct; 67(10):764-9. PubMed ID: 2247299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Horner DG; Soni PS; Salmon TO; Swartz TS Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Jul; 76(7):474-9. PubMed ID: 10445639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of spectacle and contact lens wearing times in the ACHIEVE study. Jones-Jordan LA; Chitkara M; Coffey B; Jackson JM; Manny RE; Rah MJ; Walline JJ Clin Exp Optom; 2010 May; 93(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 20557557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]