These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26105656)

  • 1. Frontal extents in virtual environments are not immune to underperception.
    Kelly JW; Hammel W; Sjolund LA; Siegel ZD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1848-53. PubMed ID: 26105656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
    Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Walking through a virtual environment improves perceived size within and beyond the walked space.
    Siegel ZD; Kelly JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27914094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial judgments of exocentric extents in an open-field situation: familiar versus unfamiliar size.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 1758767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the mechanisms underlying improved distance judgments in virtual environments.
    Kunz BR; Creem-Regehr SH
    Perception; 2015; 44(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 26492729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.
    Li Z; Phillips J; Durgin FH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2205-17. PubMed ID: 21735313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.
    Li Z; Sun E; Strawser CJ; Spiegel A; Klein B; Durgin FH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):477-93. PubMed ID: 22889186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaction with an immersive virtual environment corrects users' distance estimates.
    Richardson AR; Waller D
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):507-17. PubMed ID: 17552313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation between visual perception of allocentric distance and visually directed walking of its extent.
    Kudoh N
    Perception; 2005; 34(11):1399-416. PubMed ID: 16355744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rescaling of perceived space transfers across virtual environments.
    Siegel ZD; Kelly JW; Cherep LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1805-1814. PubMed ID: 28967784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality.
    Swan JE; Jones A; Kolstad E; Livingston MA; Smallman HS
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007; 13(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 17356211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can exocentric direction be dissociated from its exocentric distance in virtual environments?
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Matsushima EH; Da Silva JA; Ribeiro-Filho NP
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Apr; 70(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 18459265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tuning self-motion perception in virtual reality with visual illusions.
    Bruder G; Steinicke F; Wieland P; Lappe M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1068-78. PubMed ID: 22084144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologies.
    Creem-Regehr SH; Stefanucci JK; Bodenheimer B
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210456. PubMed ID: 36511405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inaccurate representation of the ground surface beyond a texture boundary.
    Wu B; He ZJ; Ooi TL
    Perception; 2007; 36(5):703-21. PubMed ID: 17624117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accommodation and size-constancy of virtual objects.
    Kenyon RV; Phenany M; Sandin D; Defanti T
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 36(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 18066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotion and auditory virtual environments: affect-based judgments of music reproduced with virtual reverberation times.
    Västfjäll D; Larsson P; Kleiner M
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2002 Feb; 5(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 11990972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.