These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26105749)

  • 1. Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Ihlefeld A; Carlyon RP; Kan A; Churchill TH; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):641-52. PubMed ID: 26105749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Cleary M; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble J; Kolberg E; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221129165. PubMed ID: 36379607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation.
    van Hoesel RJ; Jones GL; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 10(4):557-67. PubMed ID: 19513792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.
    Chung Y; Hancock KE; Delgutte B
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(20):5520-31. PubMed ID: 27194332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?
    Venter PJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 15(5):849-66. PubMed ID: 24942704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Smith ZM; Delgutte B
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 27(25):6740-50. PubMed ID: 17581961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Cosentino S; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 20(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 30623318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.