These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26106339)

  • 1. Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgments-results of a registered report.
    van 't Veer AE; Gallucci M; Stel M; van Beest I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():672. PubMed ID: 26106339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Registered report: measuring unconscious deception detection by skin temperature.
    van ' T Veer AE; Stel M; van Beest I; Gallucci M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():442. PubMed ID: 24904461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some Evidence That Truth-Tellers Are More Attractive Than Liars.
    Ten Brinke L; Raymundo I; Mukherjee M; Carney DR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; ():1461672231207567. PubMed ID: 37888143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 135(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 11931002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observers' performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines.
    Caso L; Palena N; Vrij A; Gnisci A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):571-579. PubMed ID: 31984097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.
    Fenn E; McGuire M; Langben S; Blandón-Gitlin I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26379610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.
    Fenn E; Blandón-Gitlin I; Coons J; Pineda C; Echon R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():112-22. PubMed ID: 26366466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting Observers' Accuracy when Assessing Credibility: The Effect of the Interaction between Media, Senders' Competence and Veracity.
    Caso L; Maricchiolo F; Livi S; Vrij A; Palena N
    Span J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 21():E49. PubMed ID: 30419998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some evidence for unconscious lie detection.
    Ten Brinke L; Stimson D; Carney DR
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1098-105. PubMed ID: 24659190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How deception and believability feedback affect recall.
    Vo TVA; Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):706-714. PubMed ID: 33557706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adult's veracity judgments of Black and White children's statements: the role of perceiver and target race and prejudice-related concerns.
    Zanette S; Hagi Hussein S; Malloy LC
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1177253. PubMed ID: 37564322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deception detection from written accounts.
    Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.