BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26106352)

  • 1. Construal level and free will beliefs shape perceptions of actors' proximal and distal intent.
    Plaks JE; Robinson JS
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():777. PubMed ID: 26106352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thoughts versus deeds: distal and proximal intent in lay judgments of moral responsibility.
    Plaks JE; McNichols NK; Fortune JL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Dec; 35(12):1687-701. PubMed ID: 19726810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Culture and Gender on Judgments of Intent and Responsibility.
    Plaks JE; Fortune JL; Liang LH; Robinson JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154467. PubMed ID: 27123858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination.
    Swim JK; Scott ED; Sechrist GB; Campbell B; Stangor C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 May; 84(5):944-59. PubMed ID: 12757140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it good to feel bad about littering? Conflict between moral beliefs and behaviors for everyday transgressions.
    Schwartz SA; Inbar Y
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105437. PubMed ID: 36989917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does lacking information about your affordances impact your perception of others' affordances? A test of the embodied simulation hypothesis.
    Jones KS; Widlus BP; Garcia NA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Jun; 27(3):483-489. PubMed ID: 32103468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Second-order beliefs about intention and children's attributions of sociomoral judgment.
    Shiverick SM; Moore CF
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 17313956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observers' focus of attention in the simulation of self-perception.
    Wegner DM; Finstuen K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1977 Jan; 35(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 845785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of intent-based moral judgment.
    Cushman F; Sheketoff R; Wharton S; Carey S
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):6-21. PubMed ID: 23318350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The risks of multimedia methods: effects of actor's race and gender on preferences for health states.
    Lenert LA; Ziegler J; Lee T; Unfred C; Mahmoud R
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2000; 7(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 10730601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tuning in to another person's action capabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics.
    Ramenzoni V; Riley MA; Davis T; Shockley K; Armstrong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 18665735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.
    van der Weiden A; Porcu E; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):537-552. PubMed ID: 35507019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 27826655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Counterfactuals, control, and causation: why knowledgeable people get blamed more.
    Gilbert EA; Tenney ER; Holland CR; Spellman BA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):643-58. PubMed ID: 25758707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moral complexity in middle childhood: children's evaluations of necessary harm.
    Jambon M; Smetana JG
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 23647415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple Frames of Reference Are Used During the Selection and Planning of a Sequential Joint Action.
    Ray M; Welsh TN
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():542. PubMed ID: 29765341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Young children's attribution of action to beliefs and desires.
    Bartsch K; Wellman H
    Child Dev; 1989 Aug; 60(4):946-64. PubMed ID: 2758888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Avoidant Attachment, Withdrawal-Aggression Conflict Pattern, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Mediational Dyadic Model.
    BretaƱa I; Alonso-Arbiol I; Recio P; Molero F
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():794942. PubMed ID: 35173651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors.
    Yamaguchi M; Clarke EL; Egan DL
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1407. PubMed ID: 30131747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach.
    Woodward AL
    Cognition; 1998 Nov; 69(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 9871370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.