These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26107881)

  • 1. Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education.
    Cook DA; Reed DA
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1067-76. PubMed ID: 26107881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research.
    Reed DA; Cook DA; Beckman TJ; Levine RB; Kern DE; Wright SM
    JAMA; 2007 Sep; 298(9):1002-9. PubMed ID: 17785645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical education research study quality instrument: an objective instrument susceptible to subjectivity.
    Jaros S; Beck Dallaghan G
    Med Educ Online; 2024 Dec; 29(1):2308359. PubMed ID: 38266115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conference presentation to publication: a retrospective study evaluating quality of abstracts and journal articles in medical education research.
    Stephenson CR; Vaa BE; Wang AT; Schroeder DR; Beckman TJ; Reed DA; Sawatsky AP
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):193. PubMed ID: 29121891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review.
    Cook DA; Levinson AJ; Garside S
    Med Educ; 2011 Mar; 45(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 21299598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Plea for MERSQI: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.
    Smith RP; Learman LA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 130(4):686-690. PubMed ID: 28885409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature.
    Cho MK; Bero LA
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 8015115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus.
    Al Asmri M; Haque MS; Parle J
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jan; 23(1):63. PubMed ID: 36698117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.
    Reed DA; Beckman TJ; Wright SM; Levine RB; Kern DE; Cook DA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 23(7):903-7. PubMed ID: 18612715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the methodologic quality of medical education research studies published in The American Journal of Surgery.
    Reed DA; Beckman TJ; Wright SM
    Am J Surg; 2009 Sep; 198(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 19716888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing methodological quality in dental education research using MERSQI: Analysis of publications from two journals.
    Sukotjo C; Koseoglu M; Suwannasin P; Yuan JC; Park YS; Johnson BR; Thammasitboon K; Tekian A
    J Dent Educ; 2024 Jun; 88(6):786-797. PubMed ID: 38343340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the quality of learning-team processes in medical education: development and validation of a new measure.
    Thompson BM; Levine RE; Kennedy F; Naik AD; Foldes CA; Coverdale JH; Kelly PA; Parmelee D; Richards BF; Haidet P
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S124-7. PubMed ID: 19907373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the reliability of the Johns Hopkins/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality hospital disaster drill evaluation tool.
    Kaji AH; Lewis RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Sep; 52(3):204-10, 210.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17933427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appraising the methodological quality of cadaveric studies: validation of the QUACS scale.
    Wilke J; Krause F; Niederer D; Engeroff T; Nürnberger F; Vogt L; Banzer W
    J Anat; 2015 May; 226(5):440-6. PubMed ID: 25846130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support.
    Kwong JCC; Khondker A; Lajkosz K; McDermott MBA; Frigola XB; McCradden MD; Mamdani M; Kulkarni GS; Johnson AEW
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Sep; 6(9):e2335377. PubMed ID: 37747733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.
    Giannakopoulos NN; Rammelsberg P; Eberhard L; Schmitter M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):781-8. PubMed ID: 21594656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults.
    Sabbahi DA; Lawrence HP; Limeback H; Rootman I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 37(5):451-62. PubMed ID: 19740249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of the Zwisch scale for the assessment of intraoperative performance.
    George BC; Teitelbaum EN; Meyerson SL; Schuller MC; DaRosa DA; Petrusa ER; Petito LC; Fryer JP
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):e90-6. PubMed ID: 25192794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity of three quality rating instruments for systematic reviews of observational studies.
    Hootman JM; Driban JB; Sitler MR; Harris KP; Cattano NM
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Jun; 2(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 26061679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.