These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26107881)

  • 21. Derivation of Two Critical Appraisal Scores for Trainees to Evaluate Online Educational Resources: A METRIQ Study.
    Chan TM; Thoma B; Krishnan K; Lin M; Carpenter CR; Astin M; Kulasegaram K
    West J Emerg Med; 2016 Sep; 17(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 27625722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.
    Tate RL; McDonald S; Perdices M; Togher L; Schultz R; Savage S
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 18(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 18576270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodological quality and scientific impact of quantitative nursing education research over 18 months.
    Yucha CB; Schneider BS; Smyer T; Kowalski S; Stowers E
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2011; 32(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 22235691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
    Shea BJ; Hamel C; Wells GA; Bouter LM; Kristjansson E; Grimshaw J; Henry DA; Boers M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19230606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality of published Iranian medical education research studies: a systematic review.
    Golnari P; Sodagari F; Baradaran HR
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2014; 28():79. PubMed ID: 25405144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does scale length matter? A comparison of nine- versus five-point rating scales for the mini-CEX.
    Cook DA; Beckman TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Dec; 14(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 19034679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties.
    Pieper D; Buechter RB; Li L; Prediger B; Eikermann M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):574-83. PubMed ID: 25638457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgical endoscopy education research: how are we doing?
    Anderson TN; Kearse LE; Shi R; Kaba A; Schmiederer IS; Huffman EM; Ritter EM; Korndorffer JR
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8403-8407. PubMed ID: 35194666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standardized methodological assessment of research presentations (SHARP): development of a new instrument.
    Farrokhyar F; Dath D; Amin N; Bhandari M; Kelly S; Kolkin A; Gill Pottruff C; Reid S
    Am J Surg; 2014 Jun; 207(6):964-73. PubMed ID: 24530044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB").
    Kim J; Neilipovitz D; Cardinal P; Chiu M
    Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 19212245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing statistical applications in publications on Alzheimer's disease.
    Xiong C; Tang Y; van Belle G; Miller JP; Launer LJ; Bergmann KR; Morris JC
    Neuroepidemiology; 2007; 28(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 17878738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Systematic Review of Pain Management Education in Graduate Medical Education.
    Malik Z; Ahn J; Thompson K; Palma A
    J Grad Med Educ; 2022 Apr; 14(2):178-190. PubMed ID: 35463177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic review of distributed practice and retrieval practice in health professions education.
    Trumble E; Lodge J; Mandrusiak A; Forbes R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 May; 29(2):689-714. PubMed ID: 37615780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Test-retest and interrater reliability of Barcelona Test].
    Serra-Mayoral A; Peña-Casanova J
    Neurologia; 2006; 21(6):277-81. PubMed ID: 16799901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interrater agreement, reliability and validity of the Glamorgan Paediatric Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale.
    Kottner J; Kenzler M; Wilborn D
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Apr; 23(7-8):1165-9. PubMed ID: 23121342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing changes in the quality of quantitative health educations research: a perspective from communities of practice.
    Wright KM; Gruppen LD; Kuo KW; Muzyk A; Nahmias J; Reed DA; Sandhu G; Shelgikar AV; Stojan JN; Uchida TL; Wallihan R; Hurtubise L
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Apr; 22(1):227. PubMed ID: 35365144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of global rating scale and checklist instruments for the infant lumbar puncture procedure.
    Gerard JM; Kessler DO; Braun C; Mehta R; Scalzo AJ; Auerbach M
    Simul Healthc; 2013 Jun; 8(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 23388627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.