These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26108107)

  • 1. Comparison of Goldmann Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Normal and Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Eyes.
    Pal D; Sengupta J
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2013; 2(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 26108107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
    Vajaranant TS; Price MO; Price FW; Wilensky JT; Edward DP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 145(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 18329627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tonopen XL, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Patients With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Yildiz I; Altan C; Çakmak S; Genc S; Yildirim Y; Agca A
    J Glaucoma; 2022 Nov; 31(11):909-914. PubMed ID: 35939831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
    Jivrajka R; Schultz KL; Price MO; Price FW; Wilensky JT; Edward DP; Vajaranant TS
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Mar; 23(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 22922665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
    Bochmann F; Kaufmann C; Becht C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 19384775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraocular Pressure and Trabecular Meshwork Outflow Facility After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Unterlauft JD; Elsaesser K; Grehn F; Geerling G
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Mar; 25(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 25651202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann, noncontact, Schiøtz, and dynamic contour tonometry after DSEK.
    Yi K; Bae G; Kong M; Chung ES
    Cornea; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 23538628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in relation to corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in nonglaucomatous eyes.
    Mangouritsas G; Mourtzoukos S; Mantzounis A; Alexopoulos L
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():1071-7. PubMed ID: 21847339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Özcura F; Yildirim N; Şahin A; Çolak E
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 25938044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
    Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma.
    Jordão ML; Costa VP; Rodrigues Mde L; Paula JS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 251(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 22555897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Realini T; Weinreb RN; Hobbs G
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19225347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
    Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP.
    Yoo C; Eom YS; Kim YY
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 248(11):1611-6. PubMed ID: 20652303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Lee J; Lee CH; Choi J; Yoon SY; Sung KR; Park SB; Kook MS
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19337476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.
    Unterlauft JD; Schädle N; Kasper K; Klink T; Geerling G
    Cornea; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 21716097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
    Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.