312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26108352)
1. Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.
Surti S; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(13):5343-58. PubMed ID: 26108352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Study of PET scanner designs using clinical metrics to optimize the scanner axial FOV and crystal thickness.
Surti S; Werner ME; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):3995-4012. PubMed ID: 23685783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cost-effective system designs for long axial field-of-view PET scanners.
Surti S; Werner ME; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(10):. PubMed ID: 37084744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of event positioning algorithm on performance of a whole-body PET scanner using one-to-one coupled detectors.
Surti S; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055008. PubMed ID: 29411709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.
Zhang X; Badawi RD; Cherry SR; Qi J
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jun; 63(13):135010. PubMed ID: 29799814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical observer study of lesion detectability for a long axial field-of-view whole-body PET imager using the PennPET Explorer.
Viswanath V; Daube Witherspoon ME; Karp JS; Surti S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(3):035002. PubMed ID: 31816616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.
Surti S; Karp JS; Popescu LM; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Werner M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):529-38. PubMed ID: 16689258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design Study of a Whole-Body PET Scanner with Improved Spatial and Timing Resolution.
Surti S; Shore AR; Karp JS
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2013 Jul; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 24379455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of a high-resolution brain PET scanner using four-layer MPPC DOI detectors.
Watanabe M; Saito A; Isobe T; Ote K; Yamada R; Moriya T; Omura T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):7148-7166. PubMed ID: 28753133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of an ultralow-dose high-resolution pediatric PET scanner design based on monolithic scintillators with dual-sided digital SiPM readout: a simulation study.
Mikhaylova E; Tabacchini V; Borghi G; Mollet P; D'Hoe E; Schaart DR; Vandenberghe S
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8402-8418. PubMed ID: 28944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A second-generation virtual-pinhole PET device for enhancing contrast recovery and improving lesion detectability of a whole-body PET/CT scanner.
Jiang J; Li K; Wang Q; Puterbaugh K; Young JW; Siegel SB; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):4165-4176. PubMed ID: 31315157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative image reconstruction for total-body PET imaging using the 2-meter long EXPLORER scanner.
Zhang X; Zhou J; Cherry SR; Badawi RD; Qi J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2465-2485. PubMed ID: 28240215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.
Poon JK; Dahlbom ML; Moses WW; Balakrishnan K; Wang W; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4077-94. PubMed ID: 22678106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution positron emission tomography.
Habte F; Foudray AM; Olcott PD; Levin CS
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3753-72. PubMed ID: 17664575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simulation study of a D-shape PET scanner for improved sensitivity and reduced cost in whole-body imaging.
Ahmed AM; Tashima H; Yamaya T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4107-4117. PubMed ID: 28327473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner.
Wang Y; Seidel J; Tsui BM; Vaquero JJ; Pomper MG
J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1891-900. PubMed ID: 17079824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of detector pixel size, TOF resolution and DOI on image quality in MR-compatible whole-body PET.
Thoen H; Keereman V; Mollet P; Van Holen R; Vandenberghe S
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6459-79. PubMed ID: 24002358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
