These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26108798)

  • 1. US Supreme Court throws out law that forced doctors in North Carolina to deliver antiabortion message.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2015 Jun; 350():h3446. PubMed ID: 26108798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco.
    Heminger JD
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
    Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion: the father's rights.
    Gilbert RA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restrictions on women's right to abortion: informed consent, spousal consent, and record keeping provisions.
    Karg B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 5(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 11665035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion, disability, assent, and consent.
    Häyry M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 11326790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
    Wilde ML
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion.
    Rankin MJ
    Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining minors' abortion rights.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1988; 13(5):321. PubMed ID: 3139955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A husband's consent to his wife's abortion.
    Rozovsky LE
    Dimens Health Serv; 1980 Jan; 57(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 7353739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.