These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26110027)

  • 1. Understanding Bland Altman analysis.
    Giavarina D
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 26110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research: a cross-sectional survey of current practice.
    Chhapola V; Kanwal SK; Brar R
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2015 May; 52(Pt 3):382-6. PubMed ID: 25214637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the agreement of medical instruments: overestimation of bias in the Bland-Altman analysis.
    Zaki R; Bulgiba A; Ismail NA
    Prev Med; 2013; 57 Suppl():S80-2. PubMed ID: 23313586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to regress and predict in a Bland-Altman plot? Review and contribution based on tolerance intervals and correlated-errors-in-variables models.
    Francq BG; Govaerts B
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(14):2328-58. PubMed ID: 26822948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of erythrocyte sedimentation rate measurement by the automated SEDIsystem and conventional Westergren method using the Bland and Altman statistical method.
    AlFadhli SM; Al-Awadhi AM
    Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 15961933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland-Altman limits of agreement.
    Carkeet A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):e71-80. PubMed ID: 25650900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence interval estimation for the Bland-Altman limits of agreement with multiple observations per individual.
    Zou GY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Dec; 22(6):630-42. PubMed ID: 21705434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.
    Jones M; Dobson A; O'Brian S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1308-13. PubMed ID: 21737402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting Standards for a Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews.
    Gerke O
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 32456091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When can the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method be used and when it should not be used.
    Taffé P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 137():176-181. PubMed ID: 33892090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Extension of the Bland-Altman Plot for Analyzing the Agreement of More than Two Raters.
    Möller S; Debrabant B; Halekoh U; Petersen AK; Gerke O
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33401454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for the meta-analysis of Bland-Altman studies based on a limits of agreement approach.
    Tipton E; Shuster J
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3621-3635. PubMed ID: 28664537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.
    Critchley LA; Lee A; Ho AM
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Nov; 111(5):1180-92. PubMed ID: 20736431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpreting method comparison studies by use of the bland-altman plot: reflecting the importance of sample size by incorporating confidence limits and predefined error limits in the graphic.
    Stöckl D; Rodríguez Cabaleiro D; Van Uytfanghe K; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem; 2004 Nov; 50(11):2216-8. PubMed ID: 15502104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland-Altman Method.
    Lu MJ; Zhong WH; Liu YX; Miao HZ; Li YC; Ji MH
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27838682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.
    Atkinson G; Nevill AM
    Sports Med; 1998 Oct; 26(4):217-38. PubMed ID: 9820922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical method transfer: improving interpretability with ratio-based statistical approaches.
    Frömke C; Hothorn LA; Sczesny F; Onken J; Schneider M
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2013 Feb; 74():186-93. PubMed ID: 23245250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of two measurement methods: the Bland and Altman assessment].
    Grenier B; Dubreuil M; Journois D
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2000 Feb; 19(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 10730176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Everything all right in method comparison studies?
    Alanen E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Aug; 21(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 20716590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis.
    Mantha S; Roizen MF; Fleisher LA; Thisted R; Foss J
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Mar; 90(3):593-602. PubMed ID: 10702443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.