These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26110243)

  • 1. [Patients' Priorities in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumours: An Analytical Hierarchy Process].
    Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C; Kaczynski A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Oct; 78(10):651-657. PubMed ID: 26110243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Objective Criteria in the Medicinal Therapy for Type II Diabetes: An Analysis of the Patients' Perspective with Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best-Worst Scaling].
    Mühlbacher AC; Bethge S; Kaczynski A; Juhnke C
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 May; 78(5):326-36. PubMed ID: 25853782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PATIENT PRIORITIES FOR TREATMENT ATTRIBUTES IN ADJUNCTIVE DRUG THERAPY OF SEVERE HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA IN GERMANY: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS.
    Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Dippel FW; Bethge S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):267-275. PubMed ID: 29987994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
    Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient Preferences Concerning Alternative Treatments for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of the "PIANO-Study".
    Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(3):243-251. PubMed ID: 31044688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TREATMENT AFTER ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: ANALYSIS OF PATIENT'S PRIORITIES WITH ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS.
    Mühlbacher AC; Bethge S; Kaczynski A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):284-291. PubMed ID: 27751189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment.
    Hummel MJ; Volz F; van Manen JG; Danner M; Dintsios CM; Ijzerman MJ; Gerber A
    Patient; 2012; 5(4):225-37. PubMed ID: 23098363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers.
    Morel T; Aymé S; Cassiman D; Simoens S; Morgan M; Vandebroek M
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 May; 11(1):70. PubMed ID: 27225337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The Trade-Off between Chance of Success and Urgency in Organ Allocation: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Public Preferences].
    Dao Van M; Lauerer M; Schätzlein V; Nagel E
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Jul; 78(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 27438162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment.
    Mühlbacher AC; Bridges JF; Bethge S; Dintsios CM; Schwalm A; Gerber-Grote A; Nübling M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Mar; 18(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 26846922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient Priorities Concerning Treatment Decisions for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors Identified by Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Anaka M; Chan D; Pattison S; Thawer A; Franco B; Moody L; Jackson C; Segelov E; Singh S
    Oncologist; 2024 Mar; 29(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 38007397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences.
    Danner M; Hummel JM; Volz F; van Manen JG; Wiegard B; Dintsios CM; Bastian H; Gerber A; Ijzerman MJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 22004779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduce mortality risk above all else: a discrete-choice experiment in acute coronary syndrome patients.
    Mühlbacher AC; Bethge S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Jan; 33(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 25342231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Criteria for medical prioritisation: results from a regional survey and methodological reflections].
    Stumpf S; Hecker S; Raspe H
    Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Apr; 76(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 23913398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elicitation of quantitative, choice-based preferences for Person-Centered Care among People living with Dementia in comparison to physicians' judgements in Germany: study protocol for the mixed-methods PreDemCare-study.
    Mohr W; Rädke A; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):567. PubMed ID: 35804302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation.
    Ijzerman MJ; van Til JA; Bridges JF
    Patient; 2012; 5(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 22185216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Characteristics of integrated care programmes and their impact on patient benefit: a discrete-choice experiment for integrated care networks].
    Mühlbacher AC; Bethge S; Eble S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 May; 77(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 25001905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients' preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Mühlbacher AC; Bethge S
    Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Jul; 16(6):657-70. PubMed ID: 25135768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Tünneßen M; Hiligsmann M; Stock S; Vennedey V
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):546-556. PubMed ID: 32011209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.