These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26110496)

  • 1. Cervical ripening with the balloon catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth.
    Zafran N; Garmi G; Zuarez-Easton S; Nachum Z; Salim R
    J Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 35(10):799-802. PubMed ID: 26110496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical analysis of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in 66 cases].
    He Y; Hu J; Zhang X; Huang H; Chen Q
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):741-5. PubMed ID: 25537244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical ripening with multiple medical or combined induction methods: Risks of subsequent preterm birth in nulliparous women.
    Farago N; Ginsberg Y; Bachar G; Beloosesky R; Zipori Y; Vitner D; Weiner Z; Ganem N; Khatib N
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):297-301. PubMed ID: 35064976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm.
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Hod M; Ben-Haroush A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18158629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth.
    Sciscione A; Larkin M; O'Shea A; Pollock M; Hoffman M; Colmorgen G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 15042009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin for cervical ripening to induce labor after previous cesarean delivery.
    Korb D; Renard S; Morin C; Merviel P; Sibony O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 301(4):931-940. PubMed ID: 32140810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients].
    Sarreau M; Leufflen L; Monceau E; Tariel D; Villemonteix P; Morel O; Pierre F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 Jan; 43(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 23972769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
    Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Uccella S; Agosti M; Serati M; Marchitelli G; Bolis P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 207(2):125.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22704766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Wilkinson C; Adelson P; Turnbull D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 May; 15():126. PubMed ID: 26018581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix].
    Letailleur M; Mathieu N; Dietrich G; Lethuilier C; Verspyck E; Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 25943409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery.
    Vital M; Grange J; Le Thuaut A; Dimet J; Ducarme G
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Sep; 142(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 29893994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes.
    Mackeen AD; Walker L; Ruhstaller K; Schuster M; Sciscione A
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Sep; 114(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 25170038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.
    Walfisch A; Mei-Dan E; Hallak M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(7):848-53. PubMed ID: 24939630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study.
    Shindo R; Aoki S; Yonemoto N; Yamamoto Y; Kasai J; Kasai M; Miyagi E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189665. PubMed ID: 29272277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcervical Foley's catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rab MT; Mohammed AB; Zahran KA; Hassan MM; Eldeen AR; Ebrahim EM; Yehia M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jul; 28(10):1181-5. PubMed ID: 25048751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical ripening with the Foley catheter.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Uccella S; Lischetti B; Bolis PF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 May; 97(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 17316649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.