These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2611097)

  • 21. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
    Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: effects on human male reproductive health.
    Murray TJ; Lea RG; Abramovich DR; Haites NE; Fowler PA
    Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Apr; 5(2):80-112. PubMed ID: 11753523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Uncertain gestation and pregnancy outcome.
    Chimbira TH
    Cent Afr J Med; 1989 Feb; 35(2):329-33. PubMed ID: 2776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of fundal height as a proxy for length of gestation in rural Africa.
    Andersson R; Bergström S
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1995 Jun; 98(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 7783274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?
    Nguyen TH; Larsen T; Engholm G; Møller H
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10461334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concerns about differential use of LMP in ultrasound-based EDC estimation.
    Barr WB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):2091-2. PubMed ID: 15970910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
    Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates.
    Wegienka G; Baird DD
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Apr; 14(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 15857271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A re-look at the duration of human pregnancy.
    Bhat RA; Kushtagi P
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1044-8. PubMed ID: 17139400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A microcomputer program for real-time data acquisition in the perinatal physiology laboratory.
    Dale PS; Ducsay CA; Gilbert RD; Koos BJ; Longo LD; Power GG
    J Dev Physiol; 1989 Mar; 11(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 2809133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expectation of pregnancy outcome among mature women.
    Porreco RP; Harden L; Gambotto M; Shapiro H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15672000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Calculation of hemodynamic and myocardial contractility parameters as determined by noninvasive methods using the Elektronika MK 61 microcomputer].
    Shurin MS; Tereshchenko AV; Panfilov SV
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 1989; (6):30-2. PubMed ID: 2629537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correlation between self-reported gestational age and ultrasound measurements.
    Olesen AW; Westergaard JG; Thomsen SG; Olsen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Nov; 83(11):1039-43. PubMed ID: 15488118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Issues in pregnancy dating: revisiting the evidence.
    Hunter LA
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 19410210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of ultrasonography vs clinical factors to estimate date of confinement.
    McConnon TM; Bowman WP
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Jul; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 3891907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gestational age estimation on United States livebirth certificates: a historical overview.
    Wier ML; Pearl M; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():4-12. PubMed ID: 17803613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
    Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An analysis program MULTI(ELS) based on extended nonlinear least squares method for microcomputers.
    Yamaoka K; Tanaka H; Okumura K; Yasuhara M; Hori R
    J Pharmacobiodyn; 1986 Feb; 9(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 3754893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.