BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2611122)

  • 1. Potential for irritation increases from the wrist to the cubital fossa.
    Van der Valk PG; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 1989 Dec; 121(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 2611122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry.
    Freeman S; Maibach H
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Sep; 19(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 3049697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-application occlusion substantially increases the irritant response of the skin to repeated short-term sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure.
    Van der Valk PG; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Nov; 21(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 2620512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
    Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin.
    Lee CH; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8088139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sodium lauryl sulfate irritant patch tests. III. Evaporation of aqueous vehicle influences inflammatory response.
    Dahl MV; Roering MJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1984 Sep; 11(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 6480951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Friebe K; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2003 Jan; 148(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
    Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human cutaneous irritation: induced hyporeactivity.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Oct; 17(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 2962817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
    Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Site variations in susceptibility to SLS.
    Bock M; Wulfhorst B; John SM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 17627647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Susceptibility to cumulative and acute irritant dermatitis. An experimental approach in human volunteers.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 3180788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability.
    Cua AB; Wilhelm KP; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 1990 Nov; 123(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 2248890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple parameter assessment of vulvar irritant contact dermatitis.
    Elsner P; Wilhelm D; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jul; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 2205447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tandem repeated irritation in aged skin induces distinct barrier perturbation and cytokine profile in vivo.
    Angelova-Fischer I; Becker V; Fischer TW; Zillikens D; Wigger-Alberti W; Kezic S
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 22578221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in barrier impairment and inflammation of human skin as determined by sodium lauryl sulphate penetration rate.
    de Jongh CM; Jakasa I; Verberk MM; Kezic S
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 16536807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sodium lauryl sulfate irritant patch tests. II. Variations of test responses among subjects and comparison to variations of allergic responses elicited by Toxicodendron extract.
    Dahl MV; Pass F; Trancik RJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1984 Sep; 11(3):474-7. PubMed ID: 6237135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irritancy testing in occupational dermatology: comparison between two quick tests and the acute irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Bangha E; Hinnen U; Elsner P
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1996 Nov; 76(6):450-2. PubMed ID: 8982409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced irritation in normal skin.
    Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Aug; 25(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 1935039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.