260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26111387)
41. Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation?
Antonenko D; Thielscher A; Saturnino GB; Aydin S; Ittermann B; Grittner U; Flöel A
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 30930209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT.
Oh SH; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kim TS; Kwon O; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S279-88. PubMed ID: 15798241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A flexible workflow for simulating transcranial electric stimulation in healthy and lesioned brains.
Kalloch B; Bazin PL; Villringer A; Sehm B; Hlawitschka M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0228119. PubMed ID: 32407389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ion mobility imaging and contrast mechanism of apparent conductivity in MREIT.
Oh TI; Kim YT; Minhas A; Seo JK; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(7):2265-77. PubMed ID: 21411866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Sajib SZK; Sadleir R
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1380():157-183. PubMed ID: 36306098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Feasibility of magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) conductivity imaging to evaluate brain abscess lesion: in vivo canine model.
Oh TI; Jeong WC; McEwan A; Park HM; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jul; 38(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 23239506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Noise analysis in fast magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) based on spoiled multi gradient echo (SPMGE) pulse sequence.
Oh TI; Jeong WC; Kim JE; Sajib SZ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4723-38. PubMed ID: 25082797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 Tesla field strength.
Oh SH; Lee BI; Park TS; Lee SY; Woo EJ; Cho MH; Seo JK; Kwon O
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Jun; 51(6):1292-6. PubMed ID: 15170853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling.
Caulfield KA; Badran BW; DeVries WH; Summers PM; Kofmehl E; Li X; Borckardt JJ; Bikson M; George MS
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(4):961-969. PubMed ID: 32330607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Guler S; Dannhauer M; Erem B; Macleod R; Tucker D; Turovets S; Luu P; Erdogmus D; Brooks DH
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036020. PubMed ID: 27152752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) based on the solution of the convection equation using FEM with stabilization.
Oran OF; Ider YZ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(16):5113-40. PubMed ID: 22837046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.
Rampersad SM; Janssen AM; Lucka F; Aydin Ü; Lanfer B; Lew S; Wolters CH; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 24760939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
Hamamura MJ; Muftuler LT; Birgul O; Nalcioglu O
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2753-62. PubMed ID: 16723764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Realistic Electric Field Mapping of Anisotropic Muscle During Electrical Stimulation Using a Combination of Water Diffusion Tensor and Electrical Conductivity.
Choi BK; Oh TI; Sajib SZ; Kim JW; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
Int Neurourol J; 2017 Apr; 21(Suppl 1):S32-38. PubMed ID: 28446015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Anisotropic conductivity tensor by analyzing diffusion tensor for electrical brain stimulation (EBS).
Lee MB; Kim YH; Kim HJ; Kwon OI
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 63(24):24NT04. PubMed ID: 30523812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. High-resolution MREIT using low imaging currents.
Woo EJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7025-8. PubMed ID: 22255956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In vivo high-resolution conductivity imaging of the human leg using MREIT: the first human experiment.
Kim HJ; Kim YT; Minhas AS; Jeong WC; Woo EJ; Seo JK; Kwon OJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1681-7. PubMed ID: 19369151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
