144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26112584)
1. [Basic principles of diagnostic evaluation].
Cohen J; Dubos F; Bossuyt P; Chalumeau M; Levy C; Martinot A
Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):186-7. PubMed ID: 26112584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Basic principles on selection and use of diagnostic tests: properties of diagnostic tests.
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1267-74. PubMed ID: 11865687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
Knol A
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(33):1608. PubMed ID: 10965371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Complementary examinations].
Huguier M
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2005; 100(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 15810712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluation.
Bell KJ; Macaskill P; Loy C
Med J Aust; 2020 Jan; 212(1):10-13.e1. PubMed ID: 31851371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
Zhou XH
Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. The conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of studies of diagnostic tests, and a consideration of ROC curves: answers to the January 2010 Journal Club questions.
Reynolds TA; Schriger DL
Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Jun; 55(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 20494226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
Moons KG; van der Graaf Y
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(26):1256-61. PubMed ID: 10908955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic studies].
Felder-Puig R; Mad P; Gartlehner G
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2009; 159(13-14):359-66. PubMed ID: 19652944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commentary: black and white or shades of grey?
Battaglia M; Pewsner D
Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 32(2):314-5. PubMed ID: 12714555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy efficacy: how well can this test perform the classification task?
Trop I; Stolberg HO; Nahmias C
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2003 Apr; 54(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 12736916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research: trade-off between sensitivity and specificity with change of test cut-offs.
Bharti B; Bharti S
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1051. PubMed ID: 19861569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
Desbiens NA
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(5):421-2. PubMed ID: 11575492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An improved measure for comparing diagnostic tests.
Adams NM; Hand DJ
Comput Biol Med; 2000 Mar; 30(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 10714444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
