These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26112584)

  • 21. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.
    Usher-Smith JA; Sharp SJ; Griffin SJ
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3139. PubMed ID: 27334281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer.
    Gatsonis C; Paliwal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 16861527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Roaming through methodology. X. The testing of diagnostic procedures].
    Bossuyt PM; Lijmer JG; Mol BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(43):2345-7. PubMed ID: 9864513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values: diagnosing purple mange.
    Collier J; Huebscher R
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Apr; 22(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 20409258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic accuracy: ROC solid or lost in translation?
    Søreide K
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1051-2. PubMed ID: 19861568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [General problems of selection and interpretation of diagnostic methods].
    Fikrle A
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1989 May; 128(19):577-82. PubMed ID: 2663170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
    Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
    Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic Stewardship-Leveraging the Laboratory to Improve Antimicrobial Use.
    Morgan DJ; Malani P; Diekema DJ
    JAMA; 2017 Aug; 318(7):607-608. PubMed ID: 28759678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Using characteristic numbers to estimate the usefulness of laboratory tests for diagnosis].
    Uhari M
    Duodecim; 2004; 120(8):935-41. PubMed ID: 15185506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Fardy JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: The STARD-AI Steering Group.
    Sounderajah V; Ashrafian H; Aggarwal R; De Fauw J; Denniston AK; Greaves F; Karthikesalingam A; King D; Liu X; Markar SR; McInnes MDF; Panch T; Pearson-Stuttard J; Ting DSW; Golub RM; Moher D; Bossuyt PM; Darzi A
    Nat Med; 2020 Jun; 26(6):807-808. PubMed ID: 32514173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Broce M; Reyes B
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):220-1; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Salmi LR; Michel P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 15485744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Brotman DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):221; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Autoantibodies as Diagnostic Tools.
    Houen G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1901():1-11. PubMed ID: 30539564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The STARD initiative: a possible link to diagnostic accuracy and reduction in medical error.
    McQueen MJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):307-8. PubMed ID: 12880531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Weinstein S; Obuchowski NA; Lieber ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 15615943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Interpretation of efficacy measures derived from 2 X 2 tables for the evaluation of diagnostic tests and treatment].
    Bender R
    Med Klin (Munich); 2001 Feb; 96(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 11253283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.