These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26112586)

  • 21. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):635-8. PubMed ID: 14515428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Feb; 36(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12587604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving reports of studies of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 2003 Jan; 289(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12503983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The STARD initiative and the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Bruns DE
    Clin Chem; 2003 Jan; 49(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 12507955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig L; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Kressel HY; Rifai N; Golub RM; Altman DG; Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Cohen JF;
    BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5527. PubMed ID: 26511519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication.
    Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 12658257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.
    Otwombe KN; Ogutu B
    East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Applying the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) checklist to the 2007 Transfusion article 'Evaluation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Chagas antibody in US blood donors'.
    Lucey C; Weina PJ
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2008 Feb; 102(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 18082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The STARD initiative: a possible link to diagnostic accuracy and reduction in medical error.
    McQueen MJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):307-8. PubMed ID: 12880531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Moons KG; Harrell FE
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 12809422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Value of composite reference standards in diagnostic research.
    Naaktgeboren CA; Bertens LC; van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5605. PubMed ID: 24162938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Salmi LR; Michel P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 15485744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality of reporting of studies evaluating time to diagnosis: a systematic review in paediatrics.
    Launay E; Morfouace M; Deneux-Tharaux C; Gras le-Guen C; Ravaud P; Chalumeau M
    Arch Dis Child; 2014 Mar; 99(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 24265414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reports of case-control studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP; Elmslie TJ
    CMAJ; 1990 Jul; 143(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 2357677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality of the scientific literature: all that glitters is not gold.
    Diamandis EP
    Clin Biochem; 2006 Dec; 39(12):1109-11. PubMed ID: 17052701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of two or more measurement techniques to a standard.
    Proschan MA; Leifer ES
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 16750939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.