535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26112630)
1. Evaluating the Optimal Definition of Abnormal First-Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Parameters to Predict Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.
Carter EB; Goetzinger K; Tuuli MG; Odibo L; Cahill AG; Macones GA; Odibo AO
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jul; 34(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 26112630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in the prediction of small-for-gestational age pregnancy and intrauterine growth restriction.
Melchiorre K; Leslie K; Prefumo F; Bhide A; Thilaganathan B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 33(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 19382287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Third trimester uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of preeclampsia and neonatal small for gestational age.
Običan SG; Odibo L; Tuuli MG; Rodriguez A; Odibo AO
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3484-3489. PubMed ID: 30760063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Third-trimester abnormal uterine artery Doppler findings are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Shwarzman P; Waintraub AY; Frieger M; Bashiri A; Mazor M; Hershkovitz R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2107-13. PubMed ID: 24277892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting small for gestational age in the first trimester of pregnancy using maternal ophthalmic artery Doppler indices.
Gurgel Alves JA; Maia e Holanda Moura SB; Araujo Júnior E; Tonni G; Martins WP; Da Silva Costa F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(7):1190-4. PubMed ID: 26030678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First-Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler for the Prediction of SGA at Birth: The Great Obstetrical Syndromes Study.
Drouin O; Boutin A; Paquette K; Gasse C; Guerby P; Demers S; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Dec; 40(12):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 30314872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-trimester 3-dimensional power Doppler placental vascularization indices from the whole placenta versus the placental bed to predict preeclampsia: does pregnancy-associated plasma protein a or uterine artery Doppler sonography help?
Hannaford KE; Tuuli M; Goetzinger KR; Odibo L; Cahill AG; Macones G; Odibo AO
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jun; 34(6):965-70. PubMed ID: 26014314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms in the second trimester for the prediction of preeclampsia and fetal growth retardation.
North RA; Ferrier C; Long D; Townend K; Kincaid-Smith P
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):378-86. PubMed ID: 8127529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women with positive first-trimester preterm preeclampsia screening test: the Great Obstetrical Syndromes cohort study.
Boutin A; Guerby P; Gasse C; Tapp S; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):204.e1-204.e7. PubMed ID: 32777265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive value of middle cerebral artery to uterine artery pulsatility index ratio in preeclampsia.
Eser A; Zulfıkaroglu E; Eserdag S; Kılıc S; Danısman N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 20811899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uterine and umbilical artery Doppler at 28 weeks for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler findings in the early second trimester.
Ventura W; De Paco Matallana C; Prieto-Sanchez MT; Macizo MI; Pertegal M; Nieto A; Delgado JL
Prenat Diagn; 2015 Mar; 35(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 25483940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Second trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in high risk women.
Pongrojpaw D; Chanthasenanont A; Nanthakomon T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S127-30. PubMed ID: 21294407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome in high-risk women.
Coleman MA; McCowan LM; North RA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 10776006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome.
Afrakhteh M; Moeini A; Taheri MS; Haghighatkhah HR; Fakhri M; Masoom N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 36(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 24554228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler and PAPP-A at 11-14 weeks' gestation.
Pilalis A; Souka AP; Antsaklis P; Daskalakis G; Papantoniou N; Mesogitis S; Antsaklis A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 17221926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between three-dimensional placental volume at 12 weeks and uterine artery impedance/notching at 22 weeks in screening for pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction in a low-risk population.
Hafner E; Metzenbauer M; Höfinger D; Stonek F; Schuchter K; Waldhör T; Philipp K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 27(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 16514618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uterine artery Doppler, birth weight and timing of onset of pre-eclampsia: providing insights into the dual etiology of late-onset pre-eclampsia.
Verlohren S; Melchiorre K; Khalil A; Thilaganathan B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 44(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 24448891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler ultrasound as a predictor of adverse obstetric outcome in high-risk pregnancy.
Asnafi N; Hajian K
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 21482371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvaginal uterine and umbilical artery Doppler examination of 12-16 weeks and the subsequent development of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation.
Harrington K; Goldfrad C; Carpenter RG; Campbell S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 9(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 9132263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Doppler ultrasound of the uterine artery in the prediction of severe complications during low-risk pregnancies.
Schwarze A; Nelles I; Krapp M; Friedrich M; Schmidt W; Diedrich K; Axt-Fliedner R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jan; 271(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15185101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]