These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26114514)

  • 1. A Three-Dimensional Statistical Average Skull: Application of Biometric Morphing in Generating Missing Anatomy.
    Teshima TL; Patel V; Mainprize JG; Edwards G; Antonyshyn OM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1634-8. PubMed ID: 26114514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing 3-dimensional virtual methods for reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
    Benazzi S; Senck S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1184-94. PubMed ID: 20674130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
    Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B
    J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
    Metzger MC; Hohlweg-Majert B; Schön R; Teschner M; Gellrich NC; Schmelzeisen R; Gutwald R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e1-10. PubMed ID: 17656126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing.
    Jardini AL; Larosa MA; Maciel Filho R; Zavaglia CA; Bernardes LF; Lambert CS; Calderoni DR; Kharmandayan P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1877-84. PubMed ID: 25175080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and first clinical application of automated virtual reconstruction of unilateral midface defects.
    Wagner ME; Lichtenstein JT; Winkelmann M; Shin HO; Gellrich NC; Essig H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1340-7. PubMed ID: 26211725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
    Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model.
    Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 17538314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual planning for craniomaxillofacial surgery--7 years of experience.
    Adolphs N; Haberl EJ; Liu W; Keeve E; Menneking H; Hoffmeister B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e289-95. PubMed ID: 24286863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional reconstruction of cranial defect using active contour model and image registration.
    Liao YL; Lu CF; Sun YN; Wu CT; Lee JD; Lee ST; Wu YT
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Feb; 49(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 21128121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flip-avoiding interpolating surface registration for skull reconstruction.
    Xie S; Leow WK; Lee H; Lim TC
    Int J Med Robot; 2018 Aug; 14(4):e1906. PubMed ID: 29603558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgery of complex craniofacial defects: A single-step AM-based methodology.
    Volpe Y; Furferi R; Governi L; Uccheddu F; Carfagni M; Mussa F; Scagnet M; Genitori L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 165():225-233. PubMed ID: 30337077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Creating a statistical atlas of the cranium.
    Däuber S; Krempien R; Krätz M; Welzel T; Wörn H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():116-20. PubMed ID: 15458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing semi-landmarking approaches for analyzing three-dimensional cranial morphology.
    Rolfe S; Davis C; Maga AM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 May; 175(1):227-237. PubMed ID: 33483951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Customized "In-Office" Three-Dimensional Printing for Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial Surgery.
    Mendez BM; Chiodo MV; Patel PA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1584-6. PubMed ID: 26106998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The indication and application of computer-assisted navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery-Shanghai's experience based on 104 cases.
    Yu H; Shen SG; Wang X; Zhang L; Zhang S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):770-4. PubMed ID: 23462802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a new method for building a three-dimensional physical model of the skull and dentition.
    O'Neil M; Khambay B; Bowman A; Moos KF; Barbenel J; Walker F; Ayoub A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21194815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel approach to craniofacial analysis using automated 3D landmarking of the skull.
    Wilke F; Matthews H; Herrick N; Dopkins N; Claes P; Walsh S
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12381. PubMed ID: 38811771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull.
    Swennen GR; Barth EL; Eulzer C; Schutyser F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 17208409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A geometric morphometric validation study of computed tomography-extracted craniofacial landmarks.
    Hale AR; Honeycutt KK; Ross AH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 24406584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.