These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26114942)

  • 1. Listening to Puns Elicits the Co-Activation of Alternative Homophone Meanings during Language Production.
    Rose SB; Spalek K; Abdel Rahman R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130853. PubMed ID: 26114942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do semantic sentence constraint and L2 proficiency influence language selectivity of lexical access in native language listening?
    Lagrou E; Hartsuiker RJ; Duyck W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1524-38. PubMed ID: 26460870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of hearing loss on semantic access by auditory and audiovisual speech in children.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Damian MF; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):753-62. PubMed ID: 23782714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the dynamics of aphasic word production using the picture-word interference task: a case study.
    Wilshire CE; Keall LM; Stuart EJ; O'Donnell DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):939-53. PubMed ID: 17141812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual Support for Less Salient Homophones and Pun Humor Appreciation: Evidence From Eye Movements in Reading Chinese Homophone Puns.
    Zheng W; Wang X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():875479. PubMed ID: 35645913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Head start for target language in bilingual listening.
    Fitzpatrick I; Indefrey P
    Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 1542():111-30. PubMed ID: 24144675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The nature of the homophone density effect: an ERP study with Chinese spoken monosyllable homophones.
    Wang W; Li X; Ning N; Zhang JX
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 22484016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation of a semantic picture-word interference paradigm for future language mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A behavioural study.
    Jonen M; Heim S; Grünert M; Neuloh G; Sakreida K
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113418. PubMed ID: 34153427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related effects in compound production: Evidence from a double-object picture naming task.
    Lorenz A; Zwitserlood P; Regel S; Abdel Rahman R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1667-1681. PubMed ID: 30269664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Vieth HE; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2325-39. PubMed ID: 24830335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials.
    Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H; Garrett MF; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 14(6):951-64. PubMed ID: 12191461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative homophone meanings.
    Chen L; Boland JE
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1306-23. PubMed ID: 18927045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: does orthography matter?
    Biedermann B; Nickels L
    Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):683-97. PubMed ID: 18472038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphological facilitation and semantic interference in compound production: An ERP study.
    Lorenz A; Zwitserlood P; Bürki A; Regel S; Ouyang G; Abdel Rahman R
    Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104518. PubMed ID: 33545513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neighing, barking, and drumming horses-object related sounds help and hinder picture naming.
    Mädebach A; Wöhner S; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1629-1646. PubMed ID: 28414498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why the leash constrains the dog: the impact of semantic associations on sentence production.
    Sass K; Heim S; Sachs O; Theede K; Muehlhaus J; Krach S; Kircher T
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2010; 70(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 21196951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.
    Miozzo M; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 16393051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: evidence from false memories for ambiguous words.
    Faust M; Ben-Artzi E; Harel I
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 18178246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.